I've filed a jira to add rat check to the build https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5363
And to fix the licenses: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5364 I plan on implementing them when I get in to the office today. Jon. On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I was reading into what goes into a release, and based on this I think >> of >> > have to -1 the release from an admin point of view. >> > - mvn rat:check looks like it has problems (there are also some in the >> > 0.92.0 release) -- attached to this email. >> >> >> I went through a few. Looks like its complaining mostly because of >> empty files, files it can't read the apache license in (because its >> got xml preamble), etc. I'd say this is important but my guess is >> that 0.90.5 wasn't much better. I'd suggest we could file an issue to >> fix this in 0.90.7/0.92.1 but that maybe its not enough to sink the >> release? >> >> > I chatted with some of the apache veterans, and I'm going to stand by the > -1 unless the licenses are fixed. It should be trivial fix. > > See this: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html > "What files in an Apache release do not require a license header?" > > That said, release votes are by majority, and there is no veto: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > Jon. > -- > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > // Software Engineer, Cloudera > // [email protected] > > > -- // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) // Software Engineer, Cloudera // [email protected]
