Ram, Sounds perfect.
You've asked to freeze the 0.90 branch. Is it cool if I commit two rat/license related patches onto the 0.90 branch later today? (I'm going to be away from computer for a few weeks -- long needed vacation). Jon. On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan < ramkrishna.vasude...@huawei.com> wrote: > Hi Jon > > First of all thanks a lot for working on the license issues. > > As discussed with Stack the key signing part he said he can do it. > Currently for the 0.90.6RC3 only you have voted. I received 2 +1s on RC2 > only. > If you can commit your changes once again we can take another RC for 0.90.6 > but it may delay the release further. > So in another 2 days we get more +1s then we go ahead with this Rc3, if > not > take another RC with your recent JIRAs and release that one. > > Does that sound ok ? Good on you Jon. > > Regards > Ram > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Hsieh [mailto:j...@cloudera.com] > Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 10:54 AM > To: dev@hbase.apache.org > Subject: Re: ANN: 0.90.6 RC3 available for download > > Hey Ram, > > You are the release manager so you get to decide if on the status of the > 0.90.6 release. I believe we have a workaround for the key signing bit. I > believe the rules say a sufficient condition for a release is to have at > least 3 formal pmc +1's as long as there are more +1's than -1's. (There > is no veto on releases). > > I've created patches that make rat run when you add a -Prelease profile to > the 0.90.x build and also a patch the fixes the licenses making rat pass. > If these are applied my current -1 vote will turn into a +1. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5363 (takes 0.92 and trunk as > well) > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5377 > > Also, the license fixes for 0.92/trunk were fairly trivial and I'll give > Elliot credit for them on that patch: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5364 > > Jon. > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <j...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > > > I've filed a jira to add rat check to the build > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5363 > > > > And to fix the licenses: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5364 > > > > I plan on implementing them when I get in to the office today. > > > > Jon. > > > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <j...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <j...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > >>> > I was reading into what goes into a release, and based on this I > think > >>> of > >>> > have to -1 the release from an admin point of view. > >>> > - mvn rat:check looks like it has problems (there are also some in > the > >>> > 0.92.0 release) -- attached to this email. > >>> > >>> > >>> I went through a few. Looks like its complaining mostly because of > >>> empty files, files it can't read the apache license in (because its > >>> got xml preamble), etc. I'd say this is important but my guess is > >>> that 0.90.5 wasn't much better. I'd suggest we could file an issue to > >>> fix this in 0.90.7/0.92.1 but that maybe its not enough to sink the > >>> release? > >>> > >>> > >> I chatted with some of the apache veterans, and I'm going to stand by > the > >> -1 unless the licenses are fixed. It should be trivial fix. > >> > >> See this: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html > >> "What files in an Apache release do not require a license header?" > >> > >> That said, release votes are by majority, and there is no veto: > >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > >> > >> Jon. > >> -- > >> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > >> // Software Engineer, Cloudera > >> // j...@cloudera.com > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > > // Software Engineer, Cloudera > > // j...@cloudera.com > > > > > > > > > -- > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > // Software Engineer, Cloudera > // j...@cloudera.com > > -- // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) // Software Engineer, Cloudera // j...@cloudera.com
