Right, it's historical. 0.95 would be implicitly a beta release. Calling it 0.96-beta would mean the same thing but different from what we did before (0.89 ahead of 0.90 as a "developer preview", which of course became much more than that over at FB, but that's another story).
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com> wrote: > I lack the context here, whether why we have adopted the linux's odd/even > naming convention. Anyone kind enough to remind us again? It does not > matter that much whether we go with 0.95.0-beta or 0.96.0-beta, > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
