Yep, I will start that tonight or tomorrow morning when 8755 will be done. Since it will take at least 5 days I will most probably order a new server in the meantime to not block the other performances investigations ;)
So don't expect results before wednesday.... Another option is to run tests every 50 commits to reduce the number of tests and get an idea faster, but the range will be bigger so will be harder to spot the modification which improved the read. JM 2013/6/22 lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>: > That's what I am thinking. > JM, if it's not too much work and you can it over night or something I > wouldn't say no :) > > > -- Lars > > > > ________________________________ > From: Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org> > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 6:33 PM > Subject: Re: 30% random performance in 0.95+ > > > At least I would be curious if any of that could be bottled up and > sprinkled on 0.94. > > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote: > >> Should we really worry about that? ;) If it will have been a -30%, it >> will have been an issue ;) >> >> If you want I can run the RandomRead test for the last 12 months, >> running a test for every 5 or 10 commits? so we will see when this >> happened? >> >> JM >> >> 2013/6/21 lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>: >> > Is anybody ware of what set of changes would be responsible for giving >> 0.95+ a 30% boost in random read performance over 0.94? >> > >> > Thanks. >> > >> > -- Lars >> > >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White)
