> so we might look at using Hadoop RPC directly again? Totally agree with that thought, Andrew. I must admit that I don't know about all the context on why the HBase RPC forked in the first place :-)
Your suggestion on using the Hadoop RPC work here makes sense. I am not too sure whether that is practical in the short term though (we would need to put in Tracing framework calls in Hadoop RPC and so on). IMO this will further delay the 0.96 shipping as well. However doing the equivalent patch for HADOOP-9421 in HBase will probably be easier and doable for 0.96... On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Devaraj Das <[email protected]> wrote: > > > HADOOP-9421 > > > How about turning that around? (smile) Any thoughts on removing the > indirection in Hadoop RPC like Stack did with HBase PB RPC so we might look > at using Hadoop RPC directly again? Seems if the goal is to support > pluggable authentication mechanisms being developed in core then we should > be taking that up through a core artifact, not duplicating the work over > here? > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
