On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Devaraj Das <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > so we might look at using Hadoop RPC directly again? > > > > Totally agree with that thought, Andrew. I must admit that I don't know > > about all the context on why the HBase RPC forked in the first place :-) > > > > > Bug fixes and speed optimizations > > > > > Your suggestion on using the Hadoop RPC work here makes sense. I am not > too > > sure whether that is practical in the short term though (we would need to > > put in Tracing framework calls in Hadoop RPC and so on). IMO this will > > further delay the 0.96 shipping as well. However doing the equivalent > patch > > for HADOOP-9421 in HBase will probably be easier and doable for 0.96... > > > > > That patch won't go in to hbase. Can you sketch the back and forth finally > decided upon in an issue? If you do this, I could help on how you might > get it in. > > I meant to say that using Hadoop RPC with changes needed for HBase to work makes sense (and, of course, not the patch directly from HADOOP-9421 :-) )
But I'll write up the proposal implemented in HADOOP-9421 in a HBASE jira and we can go from there. > St.Ack >
