bq. Francis' namespaces is in need of review I plan to review this feature.
The latest update to https://github.com/francisliu/hbase_namespace lagged the last comment on HBASE-8015 I wonder if there are more significant changes to be made. Cheers On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > STATUS > > +Build > > A few of us have been working on broke junit tests. Progress is slow but > steady. Currently I am looking into zombie tests -- "all" tests complete > but the build still fails. Andrew Purtell has set me up w/ a clone box > from his ec2 rig which is helping figure the zombie phenomenon. I also > just added our hadoopqa zombie detector up on apache trunk build to see if > it yields clues at nkeywals' suggestion. I also need to fix > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8764 so the ec2 integration > test build passes (ec2 build runs integration tests which apache build does > not) > > +Reviews > > Francis' namespaces is in need of review as are other 'Patch Available' > criticals that we'd like committed such as Sergey's compaction changes. If > any volunteers are game, see the 'patch available' issues here [1]. > Contrib appreciated. > > +Testing > I know of at least one rig that is going up to do long-term hbase-it tests. > Any other testing going on that folks would like to talk up? > > +Migration > > Testing and finish documentation on moving from 0.94 pedigree to 0.96. > Still TODO. > > +Packaging > > Making it so we can publish an hbase 0.96 built against hadoop1 and > hadoop2. Still TODO. > > What else? > > I am still heading for end of July for a complete '0.96'. > > Thanks, > St.Ack > > 1. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12320040#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > I am shooting for end of July for 0.96 being 'complete'. I would like > to > > make a 0.96 release in August. We have some criticals outstanding but I > > think we could ship even if these are not fixed in time (excepting > > migration polish and of course remaining build fixes). See [1.] for the > > current list of issues. Please re-prioritize issues as you see fit (or > > better, move issues out of 0.95.2 if you do not think they will be done > in > > time). > > > > What to do with namespaces -- the last 0.96 'feature' -- given the above > > timeline? Currently it is a massive patch out on a branch. It is still > > not done, in want of review, and the author is going on holidays for a > few > > weeks soon. My thinking as of now, going by the rate of change over the > > last few weeks and estimating what is yet to be done, is that namespaces > > will not make it. I am willing to be convinced otherwise but that is how > > it looks to me currently. > > > > I am going to start just disabling flakey unit tests in 0.95 from here on > > out. When folks get the itch, they can fix at leisure first on trunk and > > then over in 0.95. > > > > What else? > > > > Thanks, > > St.Ack > > > > 1. > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12320040#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > >> (Changed the subject) > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> I want to see initial data type APIs ship out with 0.95.2. A patch for > >>> ordered byte serialization is up (HBASE-8201) and is nearing > >>> steady-state. > >>> However, sershe is the only person who's left feedback. I just posted > an > >>> early patch for the data type API itself (HBASE-8693). It should get > some > >>> eyes from all manor of interested parties, but I'll settle for folk > from > >>> Phoenix for now. > >>> > >>> > >> It would be cool if Phoenix and Kiji fellows and any one else interested > >> would weigh in and take a look see. > >> > >> This does not strike me as something we should hold up the release for > >> though. It looks like something that could go in at any time? > >> > >> > >> > >>> Should these tasks be escalated to criticals in order to grab > attention? > >>> > >>> > >> I don't think that works going by past experience (and I don't think > this > >> a blocker on 0.96) > >> > >> > >> > >>> Additional comments inline. > >>> > >>> > >> ... > >> > >> > >> > >>> Namespaces is the long pole and progress seems slow. Do we hold up the > >>> > release for them? How can we hurry this effort along? Swat team > >>> descends > >>> > on Y!? > >>> > > >>> > >>> It would be a shame to not get a decision on this in for 0.96. > >>> > >>> > >> Agree. We need to get 0.96 out though. It has been too long. > >> > >> > >> > >>> + Is anyone testing? Integration tests fail on ec2 build from time to > >>> time > >>> > [2]. Our Elliott dug in on one of the failures a few days back and > >>> found > >>> > legit issue w/ no retry on admin tasks (I heart hbase-it tests). Our > >>> unit > >>> > test story is better [3] but there are still the odd failures. > >>> > > >>> > >>> With the creation of the new list, noticing these issues is going to > push > >>> further back-burner. Nannying this stuff should retain focus. I'll > >>> volunteer to track on these issues as I see them. > >>> > >>> > >> Thank you Nick. > >> > >> > >> > >>> Notice though that some of the more recent failures are caused by lack > of > >>> disk space on the Jenkins build host. > >>> > >>> > >> Oh. Missed that. Let me dig in. > >> > >> > >> St.Ack > >> > > > > >
