Thanks Stack for pushing us. For packaging, I think we should fix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8224 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8488 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6929 (same for 0.94 and 0.96)
For migration, there are some steps that the a user has to perform before going to 0.96 (recompile with 0.96, select hadoop1 or hadoop2, some minor class renamings, etc), we should document these steps in the book. (I don't remember we already have an open jira for this.) For testing, IT tests are rapidly improving. We will also start running those (or a subset of those) against 0.96. Enis On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > I love the idea of bigtop packaging. Should we do new issue for that? > Or > just use 8224. > > Ok, did both. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1029, and > linked to 8224, with comment there. > > > http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#upgrade0.96 > > Let's see about scripting that for repeatable testing. > > > it unlikely that a *design* at this stage will make the cut given > completed patches may not make it for want of review, etc., etc > > Patch, not design, didn't mean to imply otherwise. > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
