My thought is if we have a fix in a day or so a new RC would be good. Otherwise we don't (yet) have a veto, and can decide what to do on the issue.
> On Dec 14, 2014, at 7:12 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote: > > Unless that is a new issue introduced in a recent 0.98 release, or can be > expected to be fixed in a day or so, > this does not need to hold up the release IMHO. > > -- Lars > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> > To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org> > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2014 6:18 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.9 release candidate (RC0) is > available, vote closing 12/17/2014 > > Ok, I made HBASE-12686 a blocker for 0.98.9 as requested. > > > >> On Dec 14, 2014, at 4:57 PM, rajesh babu Chintaguntla >> <chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Andrew I got HBASE-12686 in 0.98 branch. >> It will not allow to balance any failures during split. I think we need to >> fix it before release. >> What do you say? >> >> Thanks, >> Rajeshbabu. >> >>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Compiled Phoenix master branch with dependency changed to HBase 0.98.9 - >>> passed >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>>> On Dec 14, 2014, at 1:19 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Verified signature. >>>> Ran through test suite against Hadoop-2 : tests passed >>>> Performed 'mvn apache-rat:check' : passed >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>>> On Dec 11, 2014, at 1:54 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The 1st HBase 0.98.9 release candidate (RC0) is available for >>> download >>>>> at http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.9RC0/ and Maven artifacts >>> are >>>>> also available in the temporary repository >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1049/ >>>>> >>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. >>>>> >>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12328795 >>>>> >>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time >>> (00:00 >>>>> -0800 GMT) on December 17 on whether or not we should release this >>> as >>>>> 0.98.8. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> - Andy >>>>> >>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >>>>> (via Tom White) >>>
