We have one new failing test on branch-1 and master, TestFastFail, in failed builds with only HBASE-12348 in common. HBASE-12348 only changes AccessController and TestAccessController. I looked at TestFastFail and don't see how an AccessController only change can affect it, there are no security coprocessors installed for that test (not that I expected any). Anyway, since those builds HBASE-12696 has been committed to branch-1 and master so I'll wait to see the build reports for those branches on HBASE-12696 before proceeding.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have pushed HBASE-12686 to 0.98. There was also a branch-1 patch so that > went in too. Local tests had a mixed result. TestSplitLogManager is flaky > for me on branch-1, but always passes when run on its own, and this happens > with or without the 12686 change. I'm going to wait to see how the branch-1 > Jenkins builds look before proceeding with a new 0.98 RC, in case a revert > is necessary. Should be just a few more hours. > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> If we can get a patch with a consensus "ok" by the end of today I'll >> restart the 0.98.9 RC, otherwise let's put it in .10. It's not a regression >> in 0.98.9, but a problem also in earlier releases. >> >> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 10:42 PM, rajesh babu Chintaguntla < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I think Vandana already had working patch it seems. I think she will >>> upload >>> patch today. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Rajeshbabu. >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Andrew Purtell < >>> [email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > My thought is if we have a fix in a day or so a new RC would be good. >>> > Otherwise we don't (yet) have a veto, and can decide what to do on the >>> > issue. >>> > >>> > >>> > > On Dec 14, 2014, at 7:12 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Unless that is a new issue introduced in a recent 0.98 release, or >>> can >>> > be expected to be fixed in a day or so, >>> > > this does not need to hold up the release IMHO. >>> > > >>> > > -- Lars >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > ----- Original Message ----- >>> > > From: Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >>> > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> > > Cc: >>> > > Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2014 6:18 PM >>> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.9 release candidate (RC0) is >>> > available, vote closing 12/17/2014 >>> > > >>> > > Ok, I made HBASE-12686 a blocker for 0.98.9 as requested. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >> On Dec 14, 2014, at 4:57 PM, rajesh babu Chintaguntla < >>> > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> Andrew I got HBASE-12686 in 0.98 branch. >>> > >> It will not allow to balance any failures during split. I think we >>> need >>> > to >>> > >> fix it before release. >>> > >> What do you say? >>> > >> >>> > >> Thanks, >>> > >> Rajeshbabu. >>> > >> >>> > >>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Compiled Phoenix master branch with dependency changed to HBase >>> 0.98.9 >>> > - >>> > >>> passed >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Cheers >>> > >>> >>> > >>>> On Dec 14, 2014, at 1:19 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> +1 >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> Verified signature. >>> > >>>> Ran through test suite against Hadoop-2 : tests passed >>> > >>>> Performed 'mvn apache-rat:check' : passed >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> Cheers >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>>> On Dec 11, 2014, at 1:54 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected] >>> > >>> > wrote: >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> The 1st HBase 0.98.9 release candidate (RC0) is available >>> for >>> > >>> download >>> > >>>>> at http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.9RC0/ and Maven >>> artifacts >>> > >>> are >>> > >>>>> also available in the temporary repository >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1049/ >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here: >>> > >>> >>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12328795 >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific >>> Time >>> > >>> (00:00 >>> > >>>>> -0800 GMT) on December 17 on whether or not we should release >>> > this >>> > >>> as >>> > >>>>> 0.98.8. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release. >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> -- >>> > >>>>> Best regards, >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> - Andy >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - >>> Piet >>> > Hein >>> > >>>>> (via Tom White) >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >> - Andy >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >> (via Tom White) >> > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
