Let's postpone this vote. See the threads on dev@ titled "Clarifying interface evolution freedom in patch releases" and "The Renumbering (proposed)".
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote: > On Apr 22, 2015 4:40 PM, "Enis Söztutar" <enis....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I think the agreement is to continue with the RC. > > > > > One note... in the japi report, I was a little surprised when I noticed > > method additions to InterfaceAudience.Public annotated classes. This > means > > that a user could write code against 1.0.1 that would not work against > > 1.0.0 which seems undesirable for a bugfix release. I read over the book > > section on compatibility and didn't see this addressed, so I thought I'd > > ask. > > > > I think this is allowed. Did not check it though. > > > > Enis > > > > It's not allowed normally under semver. There's already another thread > going on this though. > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
