Yes, consider voting resumed.
Andrew, is +1 for the RC or for resuming voting?

Let me extend the VOTE until Sunday 11:59PM PDT for lost time.

Enis

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > Can this VOTE thread come back to life now?
> > St.Ack
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > ​Let's postpone this vote.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Agreed.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > See the threads on dev@ titled "​Clarifying interface evolution
> > freedom
> > > in
> > > > patch releases" and "The Renumbering (proposed)".
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Apr 22, 2015 4:40 PM, "Enis Söztutar" <enis....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think the agreement is to continue with the RC.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > One note... in the japi report, I was a little surprised when I
> > > > noticed
> > > > > > method additions to InterfaceAudience.Public annotated classes.
> > This
> > > > > means
> > > > > > that a user could write code against 1.0.1 that would not work
> > > against
> > > > > > 1.0.0 which seems undesirable for a bugfix release. I read over
> the
> > > > book
> > > > > > section on compatibility and didn't see this addressed, so I
> > thought
> > > > I'd
> > > > > > ask.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think this is allowed. Did not check it though.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Enis
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It's not allowed normally under semver. There's already another
> > thread
> > > > > going on this though.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > >    - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Reply via email to