UT run for this RC is at https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/HBase-1.0.1RC2/4/. Previous runs had some flaky failures.
Kind reminder that the RC vote has been extended until tonight since we did not get enough votes. Please spend some time for the RC if you can. Thanks. Enis On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > Here is my +1 for the RC. > > Checked sigs, crcs, > Checked layout, jars > Checked the book > Run local mode > Run on a 5 node cluster > Run smoke test, simple shell commands > Run LTT with 1M and different encodings / compression > Run ITBLL, wrote 100M nodes > Test with 1.0.0 and 0.98.12 clients > > Thanks Ted and Josh for testing the RC. We need one more +1. Anybody else > wants to test? I'll extend the vote until tomorrow midnight PDT. > > Enis > > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 for resuming the vote. >> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Yes, consider voting resumed. >> > Andrew, is +1 for the RC or for resuming voting? >> > >> > Let me extend the VOTE until Sunday 11:59PM PDT for lost time. >> > >> > Enis >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Can this VOTE thread come back to life now? >> > > > St.Ack >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected] >> > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Andrew Purtell < >> > [email protected]> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Let's postpone this vote. >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Agreed. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > See the threads on dev@ titled "Clarifying interface evolution >> > > > freedom >> > > > > in >> > > > > > patch releases" and "The Renumbering (proposed)". >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sean Busbey < >> [email protected]> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Apr 22, 2015 4:40 PM, "Enis Söztutar" <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I think the agreement is to continue with the RC. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > One note... in the japi report, I was a little surprised >> > when I >> > > > > > noticed >> > > > > > > > method additions to InterfaceAudience.Public annotated >> classes. >> > > > This >> > > > > > > means >> > > > > > > > that a user could write code against 1.0.1 that would not >> work >> > > > > against >> > > > > > > > 1.0.0 which seems undesirable for a bugfix release. I read >> over >> > > the >> > > > > > book >> > > > > > > > section on compatibility and didn't see this addressed, so I >> > > > thought >> > > > > > I'd >> > > > > > > > ask. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I think this is allowed. Did not check it though. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Enis >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > It's not allowed normally under semver. There's already >> another >> > > > thread >> > > > > > > going on this though. >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >
