On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@apache.org> wrote:
> Any thoughts on HBASE-13517 ? It has no extra code changes so it shouldn't > be de-stabilizing. > I'm inclined to include it -- someone else have a strong argument against? Any suggestions on how we can test it properly? A new integration test maybe? On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Cody Marcel <cmar...@salesforce.com> wrote: > > > The port for PHOENIX-1728 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1728> from master is > still > > in progress. I should have the rest of the branches update today. > > > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Devs -- > > > > > > Branch-1.1 is officially closed for feature enhancements, with the > > > following exceptions: HBASE-11339, HBASE-13260, HBASE-13431. > > > > > > Please limit commits to blocker and critical bug fixes. I also ask that > > you > > > please ping me as patches go in, so that I might review them in > relation > > to > > > the testing that's been done. I do not require you wait for a +1 from > me > > on > > > these issues, simply a courtesy notification. Please use your best > > > judgement re: the above request. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Nick > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > No. > > > > > > > > semver[1] has an explicit policy to have identifiers in this format: > > > > > > > > MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH[-IDENTIFIER] > > > > > > > > From [1]: > > > > > > > > Additional labels for pre-release and build metadata are available as > > > > extensions to the MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH format. > > > > Bullet point 9 in [1] talks about this. If we want to do "developer > > > > preview" releases, we should use 1.1.0-alpha, 1.1.0-beta kind of > > version > > > > name. > > > > > > > > [1] http://semver.org/ > > > > > > > > Enis > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > > > > jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Sorry guys, > > > > > > > > > > I'm know I'm very late in the process, but should we not release > > 1.2.0 > > > > > instead of 1.1.0? > > > > > > > > > > 0.97 was for dev > > > > > 0.99 was for dev > > > > > Should 1.1 be for dev too? Should we keep even numbers for prod > > > releases > > > > > and odd for dev? > > > > > > > > > > JM > > > > > > > > > > 2015-04-22 17:32 GMT-04:00 Enis Söztutar <e...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > > > > I would love to see > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13260 > > > > in > > > > > > if > > > > > > possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > Enis > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:49 PM, rajeshb...@apache.org < > > > > > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to have it > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13431 > > > > > > > in. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Jerry He <jerry...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You have my attention all the time, Nick :-) > > > > > > > > We need the folks to get an agreement on HBASE-13149. Sean, > > > Andy, > > > > > > Enis? > > > > > > > > Of course the last resort is we do nothing but document it > with > > > > > manual > > > > > > > > workaround or manual jar replacement in 1.1. > > > > > > > > I am available to do any verification if there is any > proposal. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jerry > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
