IMO, MOB is still not settled in Master. It has a bunch of flakey tests that are getting fixed by Jingcheng or I've disabled them till someone has time to look at them. There is also a load of duplicated code that is being cleaned up (Matteo).
Its not ready to go back to branch-1 IMO. Are there users who'd like it backported? St.Ack On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Stephen Jiang <syuanjiang...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, guys, the MOB is in master branch. I saw bug fixes happening in > master branch. > > I just wonder whether there is a plan to put MOB in branch-1. I am afraid > if we don't do it now, it would be harder in the future to back port if we > decide to do it in a late time. > > Thanks > Stephen > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Thanks Jon. > > > > When I'm back in the office I'll check out master and have a look into > any > > locally repeatable test failures. Anyway in my opinion at this point it > > would make the most sense for us to keep the MOB changes in on master and > > deal with any fallout in follow on issues. I think all who voted +1 for > > this change were aware that large changes like this can have a > temporarily > > destabilizing effect. As long as the MOB devs are around to help clean > up, > > we should be good! > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <j...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > > > > > I had two clean full builds/unit test on my internal setup and the > latest > > > build went back to ~4325 total tests and failures on Procedure relate > > tests > > > cases. > > > > > > I don't think mob is responsible for these failures. > > > > > > Jon. > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <j...@cloudera.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Although the the precommit buiid passed, and the compilation and mob > > > > testing I ran after before the merge was commited passed, It looks > like > > > > the first full build after the merge [1] failed. It looked like > > > > something hung along the way, and that most of the previous builds > had > > > > failed for various reasons. :( > > > > > > > > I kicked it off again have it do another try. If it is mob related > > we'll > > > > take hunt it down and take care of it. > > > > > > > > Jon. > > > > > > > > [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/6672/ > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <j...@cloudera.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> I've merged the code in to master. Thanks for all the hard work > > > >> Jingcheng and thanks to all who have been involved with reviews, > > > >> discussion, and voting! > > > >> > > > >> Jon > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Jingcheng Du < > > jingcheng...@intel.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi all, > > > >>> > > > >>> The vote passes with 8 +1s and no -1. Thanks all for guiding, > helping > > > and > > > >>> voting! > > > >>> We will work on the merge activities and will let guys know about > the > > > >>> detailed plan for merge time. > > > >>> And thanks Jon for helping merge this branch to trunk! > > > >>> > > > >>> Regards, > > > >>> Jingcheng > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> View this message in context: > > > >>> > > > > > > http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/RESULT-VOTE-Merge-branch-hbase-11339-HBase-MOB-to-trunk-tp4073446.html > > > >>> Sent from the HBase Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > > > >> // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > >> // j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > > > > // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > > // j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > > > // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > // j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > > > - Andy > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > > (via Tom White) > > >
