It's practically November. Matteo, are you up for a thread on target dates for 2.0.0 to start RCs?
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@apache.org> wrote: > I feel the same lets keep branch-1 stable, and work towards a faster 2.0.0. > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > >> IMO, MOB is still not settled in Master. It has a bunch of flakey tests >> that are getting fixed by Jingcheng or I've disabled them till someone has >> time to look at them. There is also a load of duplicated code that is being >> cleaned up (Matteo). >> >> Its not ready to go back to branch-1 IMO. >> >> Are there users who'd like it backported? >> St.Ack >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Stephen Jiang <syuanjiang...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hello, guys, the MOB is in master branch. I saw bug fixes happening in >> > master branch. >> > >> > I just wonder whether there is a plan to put MOB in branch-1. I am >> afraid >> > if we don't do it now, it would be harder in the future to back port if >> we >> > decide to do it in a late time. >> > >> > Thanks >> > Stephen >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Thanks Jon. >> > > >> > > When I'm back in the office I'll check out master and have a look into >> > any >> > > locally repeatable test failures. Anyway in my opinion at this point it >> > > would make the most sense for us to keep the MOB changes in on master >> and >> > > deal with any fallout in follow on issues. I think all who voted +1 for >> > > this change were aware that large changes like this can have a >> > temporarily >> > > destabilizing effect. As long as the MOB devs are around to help clean >> > up, >> > > we should be good! >> > > >> > > >> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <j...@cloudera.com> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > > I had two clean full builds/unit test on my internal setup and the >> > latest >> > > > build went back to ~4325 total tests and failures on Procedure relate >> > > tests >> > > > cases. >> > > > >> > > > I don't think mob is responsible for these failures. >> > > > >> > > > Jon. >> > > > >> > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <j...@cloudera.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Although the the precommit buiid passed, and the compilation and >> mob >> > > > > testing I ran after before the merge was commited passed, It looks >> > like >> > > > > the first full build after the merge [1] failed. It looked like >> > > > > something hung along the way, and that most of the previous builds >> > had >> > > > > failed for various reasons. :( >> > > > > >> > > > > I kicked it off again have it do another try. If it is mob related >> > > we'll >> > > > > take hunt it down and take care of it. >> > > > > >> > > > > Jon. >> > > > > >> > > > > [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/6672/ >> > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <j...@cloudera.com> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > >> I've merged the code in to master. Thanks for all the hard work >> > > > >> Jingcheng and thanks to all who have been involved with reviews, >> > > > >> discussion, and voting! >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Jon >> > > > >> >> > > > >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Jingcheng Du < >> > > jingcheng...@intel.com> >> > > > >> wrote: >> > > > >> >> > > > >>> Hi all, >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> The vote passes with 8 +1s and no -1. Thanks all for guiding, >> > helping >> > > > and >> > > > >>> voting! >> > > > >>> We will work on the merge activities and will let guys know about >> > the >> > > > >>> detailed plan for merge time. >> > > > >>> And thanks Jon for helping merge this branch to trunk! >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> Regards, >> > > > >>> Jingcheng >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> -- >> > > > >>> View this message in context: >> > > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/RESULT-VOTE-Merge-branch-hbase-11339-HBase-MOB-to-trunk-tp4073446.html >> > > > >>> Sent from the HBase Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > >>> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> -- >> > > > >> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) >> > > > >> // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera >> > > > >> // j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) >> > > > > // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera >> > > > > // j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) >> > > > // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera >> > > > // j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Best regards, >> > > >> > > - Andy >> > > >> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet >> Hein >> > > (via Tom White) >> > > >> > >> -- Sean
