bq. I'll volunteer to RM 1.3 +1
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > I haven't heard an user answer in the affirmative to wanting it. > > I'll volunteer to RM 1.3, whenever we need it. Premature to have that > discussion without 1.2 even out the door yet, though. > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Stephen Jiang <syuanjiang...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Actually, it is actively changing in master branch on MOB feature made me > > think about: if we ever want to port MOB feature to branch-1, now is a > good > > time. We can commit changes in both branches; otherwise, we probably > would > > miss some commits when we port MOB to branch-1 in a late time. > > > > I am more thinking about 1.3 release (certainly not 1.2), which we still > > have some time to stabilize and allow interesting party to play with the > > feature and give feedback. > > > > Thanks > > Stephen > > > > PS. given the features we discussed in 2.0.0 in the last community > meeting, > > I think it would not release earlier than 1.3 :-), unless we > intentionally > > not find a release manager for 1.3. > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > > > > > It's practically November. Matteo, are you up for a thread on target > > > dates for 2.0.0 to start RCs? > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > I feel the same lets keep branch-1 stable, and work towards a faster > > > 2.0.0. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > > > > > >> IMO, MOB is still not settled in Master. It has a bunch of flakey > > tests > > > >> that are getting fixed by Jingcheng or I've disabled them till > someone > > > has > > > >> time to look at them. There is also a load of duplicated code that > is > > > being > > > >> cleaned up (Matteo). > > > >> > > > >> Its not ready to go back to branch-1 IMO. > > > >> > > > >> Are there users who'd like it backported? > > > >> St.Ack > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Stephen Jiang < > > > syuanjiang...@gmail.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Hello, guys, the MOB is in master branch. I saw bug fixes > happening > > > in > > > >> > master branch. > > > >> > > > > >> > I just wonder whether there is a plan to put MOB in branch-1. I > am > > > >> afraid > > > >> > if we don't do it now, it would be harder in the future to back > port > > > if > > > >> we > > > >> > decide to do it in a late time. > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks > > > >> > Stephen > > > >> > > > > >> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Andrew Purtell < > > apurt...@apache.org> > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks Jon. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > When I'm back in the office I'll check out master and have a > look > > > into > > > >> > any > > > >> > > locally repeatable test failures. Anyway in my opinion at this > > > point it > > > >> > > would make the most sense for us to keep the MOB changes in on > > > master > > > >> and > > > >> > > deal with any fallout in follow on issues. I think all who voted > > +1 > > > for > > > >> > > this change were aware that large changes like this can have a > > > >> > temporarily > > > >> > > destabilizing effect. As long as the MOB devs are around to help > > > clean > > > >> > up, > > > >> > > we should be good! > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Jonathan Hsieh < > j...@cloudera.com > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I had two clean full builds/unit test on my internal setup and > > the > > > >> > latest > > > >> > > > build went back to ~4325 total tests and failures on Procedure > > > relate > > > >> > > tests > > > >> > > > cases. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > I don't think mob is responsible for these failures. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Jon. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Jonathan Hsieh < > > j...@cloudera.com > > > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Although the the precommit buiid passed, and the compilation > > and > > > >> mob > > > >> > > > > testing I ran after before the merge was commited passed, It > > > looks > > > >> > like > > > >> > > > > the first full build after the merge [1] failed. It looked > > like > > > >> > > > > something hung along the way, and that most of the previous > > > builds > > > >> > had > > > >> > > > > failed for various reasons. :( > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > I kicked it off again have it do another try. If it is mob > > > related > > > >> > > we'll > > > >> > > > > take hunt it down and take care of it. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Jon. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/6672/ > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Jonathan Hsieh < > > > j...@cloudera.com> > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > >> I've merged the code in to master. Thanks for all the hard > > > work > > > >> > > > >> Jingcheng and thanks to all who have been involved with > > > reviews, > > > >> > > > >> discussion, and voting! > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Jon > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Jingcheng Du < > > > >> > > jingcheng...@intel.com> > > > >> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>> Hi all, > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> The vote passes with 8 +1s and no -1. Thanks all for > > guiding, > > > >> > helping > > > >> > > > and > > > >> > > > >>> voting! > > > >> > > > >>> We will work on the merge activities and will let guys > know > > > about > > > >> > the > > > >> > > > >>> detailed plan for merge time. > > > >> > > > >>> And thanks Jon for helping merge this branch to trunk! > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> Regards, > > > >> > > > >>> Jingcheng > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> -- > > > >> > > > >>> View this message in context: > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/RESULT-VOTE-Merge-branch-hbase-11339-HBase-MOB-to-trunk-tp4073446.html > > > >> > > > >>> Sent from the HBase Developer mailing list archive at > > > Nabble.com. > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> > > > >> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > > > >> > > > >> // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > >> > > > >> // j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > -- > > > >> > > > > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > > > >> > > > > // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > >> > > > > // j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > -- > > > >> > > > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > > > >> > > > // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > >> > > > // j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > -- > > > >> > > Best regards, > > > >> > > > > > >> > > - Andy > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - > > Piet > > > >> Hein > > > >> > > (via Tom White) > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sean > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
