On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > ... > + No recent work on core decision tasks (clean-up narrative around RPC > timeout, hbase:meta on master or not, batch vs partial semantic, etc.) > > Correction. batch vs partial semantic is making goodprogress (HBASE-15484). S
> Non-criticals/Ancillaries > > + Async client and C++ client are both making good progress. Not done. > + Backup/Restore is making good progress > + RegionServer-based assignment got a bunch of scrutiny lately and is now > 'done'. > + FileSystem Quotas making good progress. > > I'm seeing another month or two at least before branch and probably three. > See doc [1] for more detail. > > Yours, > St.Ack > > 1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9 > iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/edit# > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:49 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan < >> ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi All >>> >>> Thanks Stack. The doc looks great. The offheap write path/read path- I >>> think from the read path perspective we have some good feedback from >>> Alibaba folks. >>> >> >> Agree. >> >> >>> The write path subtasks are all done. We are currently working on some >>> perf >>> results that would help us to come up with some docs that suggests best >>> configs and tunings for the offheap write path configurations. >>> >>> >> Thanks Ram. Would be good to hear what configs you are looking to >> implement as default so those of us also starting to test can enable them >> to get you feedback. >> >> Also suggest you fill the above short status into the doc (You are >> keeping up full status elsewhere). I've been trying to add status as I see >> it popping up; e.g. Enis did a nice state-of-the-C++ client recently up in >> JIRA and I added pointer to the 2.0 doc. Anyone else working on 2.0 >> features, would be good if you kept a short state in this overview doc; >> just ask for edit perms. >> >> Thanks, >> St.Ack >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> Regards >>> Ram >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Andrew Purtell < >>> andrew.purt...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > I'm interested in both split meta and rsgroups. Good news. I'd like to >>> > help test. >>> > >>> > >>> > > On Jan 18, 2017, at 2:53 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Francis Liu <tof...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> Hi Stack, >>> > >> I'd like to get split meta (HBASE-112288) in 2.x as well. I can >>> have a >>> > 2.x >>> > >> draft up next week. Was working on the 1.x version internally. >>> > >> Also if you'd like I can be the owner for rsgroups as well. >>> > >> Thanks,Francis >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> I added splitting meta as a possible and had you and I as owner on >>> > > rsgroups (I was doing to do a bit of testing and doc for this >>> feature). >>> > > >>> > > Would love to see splittable meta show up. Needs to be rolling >>> > upgradeable >>> > > though. Lets chat up on the issue. >>> > > St.Ack >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 11:29 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net >>> > >>> > >> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> Done Thiruvel (And thanks Guanghao for adding hbase-replication). >>> > >> St.Ack >>> > >> >>> > >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Thiruvel Thirumoolan < >>> > >> thiru...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >>> Hi Stack, >>> > >>> I would like to add Favored Nodes to the ancillary section. >>> > >>> HBASE-15531: Favored Nodes EnhancementsStatus: Active >>> > development.Owner: >>> > >>> Thiruvel Thanks!-Thiruvel >>> > >>> >>> > >>> On Monday, January 16, 2017 2:10 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Guanghao Zhang < >>> zghao...@gmail.com> >>> > >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >>> > >>>> For 6. Significant contirbs in master only, there are some issues >>> > about >>> > >>>> replication operations routed through master. They are sub-task >>> > >>>> of HBASE-10504. And there are other umbrella issue for >>> replication, >>> > >> like >>> > >>>> HBase-14379 Replication V2 and HBASE-15867 Moving HBase >>> Replication >>> > >>>> tracking from Zookeeper to HBase. So i thought we can add a new >>> > section >>> > >>>> named >>> > >>>> hbase-replication to possible 2.0.0s. This will help us to track >>> the >>> > >>> state. >>> > >>>> Thanks. >>> > >>>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Thanks Guanghao Zhang. I agree. I made you an editor. If you want >>> to >>> > >> have a >>> > >>> go at a first cut, be my guest. If nothing done in the next day or >>> so, >>> > >> I'll >>> > >>> add this section Sir. >>> > >>> Thanks, >>> > >>> M >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >>> >> >> >
