On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks for pulling in the FS Quotas work, Stack. I'm trying to cross the > last T's and dot the last I's. > > The biggest thing I know I need to do still is to write a new chapter to > the book. After that, I'd start entertaining larger reviews/discussions to > merge the feature into master. Anyone with free time (giggles) is more than > welcome to start perusing :) > > Out of interest, this could come in after 2.0 Josh? Any 2.0 specific needs to make this work? Meantime, updated the 2.0 doc 1. Thanks Josh, St.Ack 1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/edit# > > Stack wrote: > >> Just a quick update (Please feel free to amend your own status in our >> hbase-2.0 doc [1]). >> >> On the criticals: >> >> + Little progress on the blocker AMv2. A month or more necessary still >> before code complete (Estimate) >> + Accordion (inmemory compaction) progressing nicely as is the offheap >> read/write path. Both are almost done. >> + Rolling upgrade testing. No work done. >> + No recent work on core decision tasks (clean-up narrative around RPC >> timeout, hbase:meta on master or not, batch vs partial semantic, etc.) >> >> Non-criticals/Ancillaries >> >> + Async client and C++ client are both making good progress. Not done. >> + Backup/Restore is making good progress >> + RegionServer-based assignment got a bunch of scrutiny lately and is now >> 'done'. >> + FileSystem Quotas making good progress. >> >> I'm seeing another month or two at least before branch and probably three. >> See doc [1] for more detail. >> >> Yours, >> St.Ack >> >> 1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9iEu_ >> ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/edit# >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Stack<st...@duboce.net> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:49 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan< >>> ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi All >>>> >>>> Thanks Stack. The doc looks great. The offheap write path/read path- I >>>> think from the read path perspective we have some good feedback from >>>> Alibaba folks. >>>> >>>> Agree. >>> >>> >>> The write path subtasks are all done. We are currently working on some >>>> perf >>>> results that would help us to come up with some docs that suggests best >>>> configs and tunings for the offheap write path configurations. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks Ram. Would be good to hear what configs you are looking to >>> implement as default so those of us also starting to test can enable them >>> to get you feedback. >>> >>> Also suggest you fill the above short status into the doc (You are >>> keeping >>> up full status elsewhere). I've been trying to add status as I see it >>> popping up; e.g. Enis did a nice state-of-the-C++ client recently up in >>> JIRA and I added pointer to the 2.0 doc. Anyone else working on 2.0 >>> features, would be good if you kept a short state in this overview doc; >>> just ask for edit perms. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> St.Ack >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards >>>> Ram >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Andrew Purtell<andrew.purtell@gmail.c >>>> om >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm interested in both split meta and rsgroups. Good news. I'd like to >>>>> help test. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 18, 2017, at 2:53 PM, Stack<st...@duboce.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Francis Liu<tof...@apache.org> >>>>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Stack, >>>>>>> I'd like to get split meta (HBASE-112288) in 2.x as well. I can have >>>>>>> >>>>>> a >>>> >>>>> 2.x >>>>> >>>>>> draft up next week. Was working on the 1.x version internally. >>>>>>> Also if you'd like I can be the owner for rsgroups as well. >>>>>>> Thanks,Francis >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I added splitting meta as a possible and had you and I as owner on >>>>>>> >>>>>> rsgroups (I was doing to do a bit of testing and doc for this >>>>>> >>>>> feature). >>>> >>>>> Would love to see splittable meta show up. Needs to be rolling >>>>>> >>>>> upgradeable >>>>> >>>>>> though. Lets chat up on the issue. >>>>>> St.Ack >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 11:29 AM, Stack<st...@duboce.net> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Done Thiruvel (And thanks Guanghao for adding hbase-replication). >>>>>>> St.Ack >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Thiruvel Thirumoolan< >>>>>>> thiru...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Stack, >>>>>>>> I would like to add Favored Nodes to the ancillary section. >>>>>>>> HBASE-15531: Favored Nodes EnhancementsStatus: Active >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> development.Owner: >>>>> >>>>>> Thiruvel Thanks!-Thiruvel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Monday, January 16, 2017 2:10 PM, Stack<st...@duboce.net> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Guanghao Zhang<zghao...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For 6. Significant contirbs in master only, there are some issues >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> about >>>>> >>>>>> replication operations routed through master. They are sub-task >>>>>>>>> of HBASE-10504. And there are other umbrella issue for replication, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> like >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> HBase-14379 Replication V2 and HBASE-15867 Moving HBase Replication >>>>>>>>> tracking from Zookeeper to HBase. So i thought we can add a new >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> section >>>>> >>>>>> named >>>>>>>>> hbase-replication to possible 2.0.0s. This will help us to track >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the >>>> >>>>> state. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks Guanghao Zhang. I agree. I made you an editor. If you want >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> have a >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> go at a first cut, be my guest. If nothing done in the next day or >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> so, >>>> >>>>> I'll >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> add this section Sir. >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> M >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>> >>
