On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Sean Busbey <sean.bus...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Given that all of the old post-commit tests have been posting that
> they're failing to JIRAs for what looks like a month, is there any
> reason not to switch to the new tests that also say they're failing?
>
>
No reason.



> The reason HBASE-18467 has been sitting on hold this whole time has
> been because the new nightly branch tests keep complaining about
> failures.
>
>
Looking just now, it looks like killed-off test runs.

+1 on move to nightlies.

Can I help?

Should I be able to see the machine dir when I look at nightlies output?
(Was trying to see what else is running).

Thanks Sean,
St.Ack






> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Sean Busbey <sean.bus...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > It looks like old tests branch-1.2 and branch-1.3 are failing with
> > some maven enforcer problem that we thought we had fixed a few times
> > before. It's probably fixable by changing the version of maven they
> > use, but I'd much rather any test effort go into the last mile of
> > getting our new nightly tests working.
> >
> > I'll start picking this up as soon as I close out HBASE-18784.
> >
> > Please consider branch-1.2 release blocked. :(
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >> Our builds seem pretty sick up on builds.apache.org even after the
> miracle
> >> work by Allen W containing errant hadoop processes. Looking at 1.2 and
> 1.3,
> >> we don't even get off the ground. Anyone been taking a look?
> >>
> >> When I try to run the branch-1.2 and branch-1.3 unit tests locally,
> about
> >> ten tests or so timeout. Have others tried branch-1 test runs recently?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> S
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Loads of tests timing out in test runs -- then they all pass. Anyone
> have
> >>> an input? I'm trying to take a look as background task...
> >>>
> >>> S
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks Appy.
> >>>>
> >>>> Any one looking at the 'ERROR ExecutionException Java heap space...'
> >>>> errors on patch builds or failed forking? Seems common enough. Here
> are
> >>>> complaints that remote JVM went away:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/PreCommit-
> >>>> HBASE-Build/7617/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hbase-server.txt
> >>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/PreCommit-
> >>>> HBASE-Build/7616/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hbase-server.txt
> >>>>
> >>>> Then this succeeds....
> >>>>
> >>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/PreCommit-
> >>>> HBASE-Build/7614/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hbase-server.txt
> >>>>
> >>>> And we are good for a while.
> >>>>
> >>>> Then heap issues:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/PreCommit-
> >>>> HBASE-Build/7607/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hbase-server.txt
> >>>>
> >>>> Are the zombies back?
> >>>>
> >>>> St.Ack
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Apekshit Sharma <a...@cloudera.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Fixed 'trends' in flaky dashboard. Since i changed the test names in
> last
> >>>>> fix, the dots in the name were messing up with CSS selectors. :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Apekshit Sharma <a...@cloudera.com
> >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > Quick update on flaky dashboard:
> >>>>> > Flaky dashboard wasn't working earlier because our trunk build was
> >>>>> broken.
> >>>>> > After trunk was fixed, the format of log lines in consoleText was
> not
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> > same, so findHangingTests.py was not able to parse it correctly for
> >>>>> > broken/hanging/timeout tests. That's been fixed now HBASE-18341
> >>>>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18341>.
> >>>>> > Drob brought up in other thread that 'treads' isn't working. It's
> >>>>> probably
> >>>>> > because i changed tests names (which are used as keys in python
> dicts)
> >>>>> from
> >>>>> > just class name to package name+classname (without common
> >>>>> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase prefix). I had to do it because we have
> some
> >>>>> tests
> >>>>> > with same class name but in different packages.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > I'll take a look at it sometime this week (unless someone wants to
> >>>>> take it
> >>>>> > up and work on this beautiful piece of infra ;) )
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> > that sounds like our project structure is broken. Please make
> sure
> >>>>> >> there's
> >>>>> >> > a jira that tracks it and I'll take a look later.
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> Filed HBASE-18331 for now.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> I can take a look too later.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> St.Ack
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >> > > I tried publishing hbase-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT... so hbase-checkstyle
> >>>>> was up
> >>>>> >> in
> >>>>> >> > > repo (presuming it relied on an aged-out snapshot). Seems to
> have
> >>>>> >> 'fixed'
> >>>>> >> > > it for now....
> >>>>> >> > >
> >>>>> >> > > St.Ack
> >>>>> >> > >
> >>>>> >> > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> wrote:
> >>>>> >> > >
> >>>>> >> > > > The 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT looks suspicious ... the hbase
> version....
> >>>>> >> > > > St.Ack
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > >> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> >> > > >>
> >>>>> >> > > >>> Checkstyle is currently broke on our builds... looking.
> >>>>> >> > > >>> St.Ack
> >>>>> >> > > >>>
> >>>>> >> > > >>>
> >>>>> >> > > >> Works if I run it locally (of course)
> >>>>> >> > > >> St.Ack
> >>>>> >> > > >>
> >>>>> >> > > >>
> >>>>> >> > > >>
> >>>>> >> > > >>
> >>>>> >> > > >>>
> >>>>> >> > > >>>
> >>>>> >> > > >>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
> >>>>> >> > > maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.17:checkstyle (default-cli) on
> project
> >>>>> >> hbase:
> >>>>> >> > > Execution default-cli of goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
> >>>>> >> > > maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.17:checkstyle failed: Plugin
> >>>>> >> > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.17 or one
> of
> >>>>> its
> >>>>> >> > > dependencies could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> >>>>> >> > > org.apache.hbase:hbase-checkstyle:jar:3.0.0-SNAPSHOT in
> Nexus (
> >>>>> >> > > http://repository.apache.org/snapshots) -> [Help 1][ERROR]
> >>>>> [ERROR] To
> >>>>> >> > see
> >>>>> >> > > the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e
> >>>>> >> > switch.[ERROR]
> >>>>> >> > > Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug
> >>>>> logging.[ERROR]
> >>>>> >> > > [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible
> >>>>> solutions,
> >>>>> >> > > please read the following articles:[ERROR] [Help 1]
> >>>>> >> > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/
> >>>>> >> > > PluginResolutionExceptionBuild step 'Invoke top-level Maven
> >>>>> targets'
> >>>>> >> > > marked build as failure
> >>>>> >> > > >>> Performing Post build task...
> >>>>> >> > > >>> Match found for :.* : True
> >>>>> >> > > >>> Logical operation result is TRUE
> >>>>> >> > > >>> Running script  : # Run zombie detector script
> >>>>> >> > > >>> ./dev-support/zombie-detector.sh --jenkins ${BUILD_ID}
> >>>>> >> > > >>> [a3159d73] $ /bin/bash -xe /tmp/
> hudson1697041977582083402.sh
> >>>>> >> > > >>> + ./dev-support/zombie-detector.sh --jenkins 3320
> >>>>> >> > > >>> Thu Jul  6 01:37:09 UTC 2017 We're ok: there is no zombie
> test
> >>>>> >> > > >>>
> >>>>> >> > > >>>
> >>>>> >> > > >>>
> >>>>> >> > > >>>
> >>>>> >> > > >>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Sean Busbey <
> >>>>> bus...@apache.org>
> >>>>> >> > > wrote:
> >>>>> >> > > >>>
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> jacoco was added ages ago. I'd guess that something
> changed
> >>>>> on
> >>>>> >> the
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> machines
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> we use to cause it to stop working.
> >>>>> >> > > >>>>
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Stack <
> st...@duboce.net>
> >>>>> >> wrote:
> >>>>> >> > > >>>>
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Josh Elser <
> >>>>> els...@apache.org
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> >
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > >
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > >
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > > On 6/27/17 7:20 PM, Stack wrote:
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > >
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > >> * test-patch's whitespace plugin can configured to
> >>>>> ignore
> >>>>> >> some
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> files
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > (but
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > >>> I
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > >>> can't think of any we'd care to so whitelist)
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > >>>
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > >>> Generated files.
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > >>
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > >
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > > Oh my goodness, yes, please. This has been such a
> pain
> >>>>> in the
> >>>>> >> > rear
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> for me
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > > as I've been rebasing space quota patches.
> Sometimes, the
> >>>>> >> spaces
> >>>>> >> > > in
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > > pb-gen'ed code are removed by folks before commit,
> other
> >>>>> >> times
> >>>>> >> > > they
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > aren't.
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > >
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> >
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > Agree sir. Its a distraction at least.
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> >
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > I see Jacoco report here now:
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > https://builds.apache.org/job/
> HBase-Trunk_matrix/jdk=JDK%
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > 201.8%20(latest),label=Hadoop/3277/
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> >
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > Maybe it has been there always and I just haven't
> noticed.
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> >
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > Its all 0%. We need to turn on stuff?
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> >
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> > St.Ack
> >>>>> >> > > >>>> >
> >>>>> >> > > >>>>
> >>>>> >> > > >>>
> >>>>> >> > > >>>
> >>>>> >> > > >>
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > >
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > --
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > -- Appy
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -- Appy
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sean
>
>
>
> --
> Sean
>

Reply via email to