thanks for all the work as RM on this Andrew!
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > Everything is in and ready to go. I'm out next week for the Thanksgiving > holiday, but will be back first week in December. > > Here is what I anticipate: > > - December 4 > - 1.4.0 RC0 binaries will be available. > - Voting begins. > - Preflight checks will include RAT check, release audits, and 25 > iterations of the unit test suite. > - December 5 - 8 > - 24 hours ITBLL > - PE and YCSB on cluster perf comparison with 1.2 > - PE and YCSB single server profiling with JFR, comparison with 1.2 > - December 11 > - Voting concludes > - Release, or RC1 depending on testing outcome > - December 18 > - RC1 voting concludes and release, if we need a RC1 > > > From now until the 1.4.0 release, please refrain from committing > potentially destabilizing changes or changes to public APIs to branch-1.4. > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On HBASE-19232 we discuss testing the shaded client using YCSB, so I'll >> use it to sanity check the shaded client as well as complete a perf >> comparison with 1.2. >> >> >> >> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I'll do a PE comparison between 1.4.0 and 1.3 and/or 1.2. Maybe YSCB too >>> if I have time. Good idea, thanks. >>> >>> >>> > On Nov 11, 2017, at 5:05 AM, Yu Li <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > Great to know, really good progress! >>> > >>> > It seems we don't do performance comparison with current stable release >>> > when releasing the first RC of a new branch, but should we do to avoid >>> > issues like HBASE-14460 (write performance regression from 0.98 to 1.1)? >>> > This is a must-have for us to decide new version for product env here, >>> and >>> > I wonder whether this applies for most users (please forgive my >>> ignorance >>> > if there's any existing policy for this). Thanks. >>> > >>> > bq. Back when we first discussed branching for 1.4 Yu Li asked for >>> this... >>> > Thanks for remembering this and keeping the promise boss (smile). >>> > >>> > Best Regards, >>> > Yu >>> > >>> >> On 11 November 2017 at 03:30, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> The march to 1.4.0 is progressing. >>> >> >>> >> I've run the unit test suite on a C4 class AWS instance 25 times and >>> there >>> >> are no failures. This is ongoing. I'm aiming for 100 runs. >>> >> >>> >> Fix versions are now set up for constructing a reasonable change log. >>> >> >>> >> With HBASE-19232 applied a build with release audits enabled will pass. >>> >> >>> >> I backported error-prone support yesterday and will now look at >>> checkstyle >>> >> and error-prone analyses for important issues. >>> >> >>> >> I'll probably do HBASE-19238 before 1.4.0 goes out so that neat utility >>> >> will be available. >>> >> >>> >> Back when we first discussed branching for 1.4 Yu Li asked for this: >>> >> >>> >>> One naive question here: from the book >>> >>> <http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning> we will add >>> >>> functionality (in a backwards-compatible manner) in minor versions, >>> but >>> >> it >>> >>> seems we don't have any one-line description on the differences (what >>> >>> main functionalities have been added) between branch-1.1/1.2/1.3/1.4 >>> so >>> >>> user could better decide which version to choose/upgrade. Should we >>> >>> add some explicit document on this? Or release note of the first >>> release >>> >>> for each branch is enough? Thanks. >>> >> >>> >> and I still agree to do it. I'll write it up while the RC is under >>> >> evaluation. >>> >> >>> >> ITBLL and replication testing to be performed on a small cluster once >>> we >>> >> have the RC binaries. >>> >> >>> >> Anything else? (Within reason...) >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Best regards, >>> >> Andrew >>> >> >>> >> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's >>> >> decrepit hands >>> >> - A23, Crosstalk >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Andrew >> >> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's >> decrepit hands >> - A23, Crosstalk >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Andrew > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > decrepit hands > - A23, Crosstalk
