The TestEndToEndSplitTransaction failure will be fixed by HBASE-19379. The TestGlobalThrottler issue is a hang, which is probably why it slipped through the cracks. I went back 32 commits from head and it was still stuck. 64 commits back it's good. Somewhere in between. Will get to the offending commit shortly.
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks. I'll take a look. They were passing for me before I went out on > vacation. > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks. >> >> BTW, I noticed this morning that TestGlobalThrottler and >> TestEndToEndSplitTransaction >> fail locally for me and up on jenkins as part of hadoopqa runs and on >> recent 1.4 runs. >> >> I tried to poke at why. They seem fine in 1.2, 1.3, and 2.0. Got >> distracted >> and got no further than this.... >> >> S >> >> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Ok, no problem. >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > May I get HBASE-18233 into 1.4.0 Andrew? It is in 1.2 and 1.3. >> Waiting on >> > > hadoopqa run. Would be good to have it all up and down branch-1. >> > > Thanks Sir, >> > > St.Ack >> > > >> > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Peter Somogyi < >> [email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > HBASE-19188 was just resolved. :) >> > > > >> > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Andrew Purtell < >> [email protected]> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > I come back to find HBASE-19188 is a blocker. :-/ >> > > > > Need to resolve it >> > > > > >> > > > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > thanks for all the work as RM on this Andrew! >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Andrew Purtell >> > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > > > Everything is in and ready to go. I'm out next week for the >> > > > > Thanksgiving >> > > > > > > holiday, but will be back first week in December. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Here is what I anticipate: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > - December 4 >> > > > > > > - 1.4.0 RC0 binaries will be available. >> > > > > > > - Voting begins. >> > > > > > > - Preflight checks will include RAT check, release >> audits, >> > > and >> > > > 25 >> > > > > > > iterations of the unit test suite. >> > > > > > > - December 5 - 8 >> > > > > > > - 24 hours ITBLL >> > > > > > > - PE and YCSB on cluster perf comparison with 1.2 >> > > > > > > - PE and YCSB single server profiling with JFR, >> comparison >> > > with >> > > > > 1.2 >> > > > > > > - December 11 >> > > > > > > - Voting concludes >> > > > > > > - Release, or RC1 depending on testing outcome >> > > > > > > - December 18 >> > > > > > > - RC1 voting concludes and release, if we need a RC1 >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > From now until the 1.4.0 release, please refrain from >> committing >> > > > > > > potentially destabilizing changes or changes to public APIs to >> > > > > > branch-1.4. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Andrew Purtell < >> > > > > > [email protected]> >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On HBASE-19232 we discuss testing the shaded client using >> YCSB, >> > so >> > > > > I'll >> > > > > > >> use it to sanity check the shaded client as well as complete >> a >> > > perf >> > > > > > >> comparison with 1.2. >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Andrew Purtell < >> > > > > > [email protected]> >> > > > > > >> wrote: >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >>> I'll do a PE comparison between 1.4.0 and 1.3 and/or 1.2. >> Maybe >> > > > YSCB >> > > > > > too >> > > > > > >>> if I have time. Good idea, thanks. >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> > On Nov 11, 2017, at 5:05 AM, Yu Li <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > Great to know, really good progress! >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > It seems we don't do performance comparison with current >> > stable >> > > > > > release >> > > > > > >>> > when releasing the first RC of a new branch, but should >> we do >> > > to >> > > > > > avoid >> > > > > > >>> > issues like HBASE-14460 (write performance regression from >> > 0.98 >> > > > to >> > > > > > 1.1)? >> > > > > > >>> > This is a must-have for us to decide new version for >> product >> > > env >> > > > > > here, >> > > > > > >>> and >> > > > > > >>> > I wonder whether this applies for most users (please >> forgive >> > my >> > > > > > >>> ignorance >> > > > > > >>> > if there's any existing policy for this). Thanks. >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > bq. Back when we first discussed branching for 1.4 Yu Li >> > asked >> > > > for >> > > > > > >>> this... >> > > > > > >>> > Thanks for remembering this and keeping the promise boss >> > > (smile). >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > Best Regards, >> > > > > > >>> > Yu >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> >> On 11 November 2017 at 03:30, Andrew Purtell < >> > > > [email protected] >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> wrote: >> > > > > > >>> >> >> > > > > > >>> >> The march to 1.4.0 is progressing. >> > > > > > >>> >> >> > > > > > >>> >> I've run the unit test suite on a C4 class AWS instance >> 25 >> > > times >> > > > > and >> > > > > > >>> there >> > > > > > >>> >> are no failures. This is ongoing. I'm aiming for 100 >> runs. >> > > > > > >>> >> >> > > > > > >>> >> Fix versions are now set up for constructing a reasonable >> > > change >> > > > > > log. >> > > > > > >>> >> >> > > > > > >>> >> With HBASE-19232 applied a build with release audits >> enabled >> > > > will >> > > > > > pass. >> > > > > > >>> >> >> > > > > > >>> >> I backported error-prone support yesterday and will now >> look >> > > at >> > > > > > >>> checkstyle >> > > > > > >>> >> and error-prone analyses for important issues. >> > > > > > >>> >> >> > > > > > >>> >> I'll probably do HBASE-19238 before 1.4.0 goes out so >> that >> > > neat >> > > > > > utility >> > > > > > >>> >> will be available. >> > > > > > >>> >> >> > > > > > >>> >> Back when we first discussed branching for 1.4 Yu Li >> asked >> > for >> > > > > this: >> > > > > > >>> >> >> > > > > > >>> >>> One naive question here: from the book >> > > > > > >>> >>> <http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning> we >> > will >> > > > add >> > > > > > >>> >>> functionality (in a backwards-compatible manner) in >> minor >> > > > > versions, >> > > > > > >>> but >> > > > > > >>> >> it >> > > > > > >>> >>> seems we don't have any one-line description on the >> > > differences >> > > > > > (what >> > > > > > >>> >>> main functionalities have been added) between >> > > > > > branch-1.1/1.2/1.3/1.4 >> > > > > > >>> so >> > > > > > >>> >>> user could better decide which version to >> choose/upgrade. >> > > > Should >> > > > > we >> > > > > > >>> >>> add some explicit document on this? Or release note of >> the >> > > > first >> > > > > > >>> release >> > > > > > >>> >>> for each branch is enough? Thanks. >> > > > > > >>> >> >> > > > > > >>> >> and I still agree to do it. I'll write it up while the >> RC is >> > > > under >> > > > > > >>> >> evaluation. >> > > > > > >>> >> >> > > > > > >>> >> ITBLL and replication testing to be performed on a small >> > > cluster >> > > > > > once >> > > > > > >>> we >> > > > > > >>> >> have the RC binaries. >> > > > > > >>> >> >> > > > > > >>> >> Anything else? (Within reason...) >> > > > > > >>> >> >> > > > > > >>> >> -- >> > > > > > >>> >> Best regards, >> > > > > > >>> >> Andrew >> > > > > > >>> >> >> > > > > > >>> >> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn >> > from >> > > > > > truth's >> > > > > > >>> >> decrepit hands >> > > > > > >>> >> - A23, Crosstalk >> > > > > > >>> >> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> -- >> > > > > > >> Best regards, >> > > > > > >> Andrew >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn >> from >> > > > truth's >> > > > > > >> decrepit hands >> > > > > > >> - A23, Crosstalk >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > Best regards, >> > > > > > > Andrew >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from >> > > > truth's >> > > > > > > decrepit hands >> > > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > Best regards, >> > > > > Andrew >> > > > > >> > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from >> > truth's >> > > > > decrepit hands >> > > > > - A23, Crosstalk >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Best regards, >> > Andrew >> > >> > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's >> > decrepit hands >> > - A23, Crosstalk >> > >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Andrew > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > decrepit hands > - A23, Crosstalk > -- Best regards, Andrew Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's decrepit hands - A23, Crosstalk
