On Jan 5, 2018 4:44 PM, "Apekshit Sharma" <a...@cloudera.com> wrote:
bq. Care needs to be exercised backporting. Bug fixes only please. If in doubt, ping me, the RM, please. Thanks. In that case, shouldn't we branch out branch-2.0? We can then do normal backports to branch-2 and only bug fixes to branch-2.0. Don't you think we have enough branches already mighty Appy? No new features on branch-2? New features are in master/3.0.0 only? S On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool is a flake, not a consistent fail. > > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 7:18 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > This one is probably my fault: > > > > > > TestDefaultCompactSelection > > > > > > HBASE-19406 > > > > > > > > Balazs fixed it above, HBASE-19666 > > > > > > > > > It can easily be reverted. The failure of interest > > > is TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs. > > > > > > > > This seems fine. Passes in nightly > > https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase% > > 20Nightly/job/branch-2/171/testReport/org.apache.hadoop. > > hbase.regionserver/TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool/ > > and locally against the tag. It fails consistently for you Andrew? > > > > > > > > Should all unit tests pass on a beta? I think so, at least if the > > > failures > > > > are 100% repeatable. > > > > > > > > > > > This is fair. Let me squash this RC and roll another. > > > > Will put it up in a few hours. > > > > Thanks, > > S > > > > > > > > > > -0 > > > > > > > > Checked sums and signatures: ok > > > > RAT check: ok > > > > Built from source: ok (8u144) > > > > Ran unit tests: some failures (8u144) > > > > > > > > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio:74-> > > > > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy. > > > compactEquals:201 > > > > expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]> > > > > > > > > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection.testStuckStoreCompaction:145-> > > > > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy. > > > compactEquals:201 > > > > expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but was:<[[99, 30, ]30, 30, 30]> > > > > > > > > [ERROR] TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleM > > > SLABs:143 > > > > All the chunks must have been cleared > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > > > > > >> The first release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up at: > > > >> > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0- > beta-1-RC0/ > > > >> > > > >> Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here: > > > >> > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > orgapachehbase-1188 > > > >> > > > >> All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1] > > > >> > > > >> I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC0 > > > >> (0907563eb72697b394b8b960fe54887d6ff304fd) > > > >> > > > >> hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It includes all that > was > > > in > > > >> previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap read/write path, > > > >> in-memory > > > >> compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are sealed. > > > >> > > > >> hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview of hbase-2.0.0. > It > > is > > > >> meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if we > > messed > > > up > > > >> on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are particular interested > in > > > >> hearing from Coprocessor developers. > > > >> > > > >> The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found here > [3]. > > > >> There > > > >> are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively can be > > found > > > >> here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive me if mistakes). > > > >> > > > >> I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 [6]. We'll do > one > > > >> more > > > >> beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release Candidate by the end > of > > > >> January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it so users can do a > > > >> rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and any bug fixes > > found > > > >> running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have targeted so far > for > > > >> beta-2 [5]. Check it out. > > > >> > > > >> One knownissue is that the User API has not been properly filtered > so > > it > > > >> shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content (HBASE-19663, > to > > > be > > > >> fixed by beta-2). > > > >> > > > >> Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it ok to > put > > > out > > > >> this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been updated). > Let > > > the > > > >> VOTE be open for 72 hours (Monday) > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> Your 2.0.0 Release Manager > > > >> > > > >> 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2 > > > >> 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr > > > >> 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b > > > >> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12340862 > > > >> 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9iEu_ > > > >> ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/ > > > >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9iEu_ > > > ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best regards, > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from > truth's > > > > decrepit hands > > > > - A23, Crosstalk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > Andrew > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > > > decrepit hands > > > - A23, Crosstalk > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Andrew > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > decrepit hands > - A23, Crosstalk > -- -- Appy
