I can reproduce the issue locally. I think it has to do with the java version being used - IIRC this is related to the version of java used, but we can discuss in more detail on the JIRA.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19721 Thanks, JMS! On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 6:42 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-m...@spaggiari.org > wrote: > How you guys are able to get the tests running? > > For me it keeps failing on TestReversedScannerCallable. > > I tried many times, always fails in the same place. I'm running on a 4GB > tmpfs. Details are below. Am I doing something wrong? > > JM > > > > ./dev-support/hbasetests.sh runAllTests > > > > [INFO] Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestOperation > [INFO] > [INFO] Results: > [INFO] > [ERROR] Errors: > [ERROR] TestReversedScannerCallable.unnecessary Mockito stubbings ยป > UnnecessaryStubbing > [INFO] > [ERROR] Tests run: 245, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 8 > [INFO] > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] Reactor Summary: > [INFO] > [INFO] Apache HBase ....................................... SUCCESS [ > 1.409 s] > [INFO] Apache HBase - Checkstyle .......................... SUCCESS [ > 1.295 s] > [INFO] Apache HBase - Build Support ....................... SUCCESS [ > 0.038 s] > [INFO] Apache HBase - Error Prone Rules ................... SUCCESS [ > 1.069 s] > [INFO] Apache HBase - Annotations ......................... SUCCESS [ > 1.450 s] > [INFO] Apache HBase - Build Configuration ................. SUCCESS [ > 0.073 s] > [INFO] Apache HBase - Shaded Protocol ..................... SUCCESS [ > 14.292 s] > [INFO] Apache HBase - Common .............................. SUCCESS [01:51 > min] > [INFO] Apache HBase - Metrics API ......................... SUCCESS [ > 2.878 s] > [INFO] Apache HBase - Hadoop Compatibility ................ SUCCESS [ > 12.216 s] > [INFO] Apache HBase - Metrics Implementation .............. SUCCESS [ > 7.206 s] > [INFO] Apache HBase - Hadoop Two Compatibility ............ SUCCESS [ > 12.440 s] > [INFO] Apache HBase - Protocol ............................ SUCCESS [ > 0.074 s] > [INFO] Apache HBase - Client .............................. FAILURE [02:10 > min] > [INFO] Apache HBase - Zookeeper ........................... SKIPPED > [INFO] Apache HBase - Replication ......................... SKIPPED > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------- > Test set: org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestReversedScannerCallable > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------- > Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.515 s <<< > FAILURE! - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestReversedScannerCallable > unnecessary Mockito > stubbings(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestReversedScannerCallable) > Time > elapsed: 0.014 s <<< ERROR! > org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.UnnecessaryStubbingException: > > Unnecessary stubbings detected in test class: TestReversedScannerCallable > Clean & maintainable test code requires zero unnecessary code. > Following stubbings are unnecessary (click to navigate to relevant line of > code): > 1. -> at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestReversedScannerCallable.setUp( > TestReversedScannerCallable.java:66) > 2. -> at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestReversedScannerCallable.setUp( > TestReversedScannerCallable.java:68) > Please remove unnecessary stubbings. More info: javadoc for > UnnecessaryStubbingException class. > > > 2018-01-06 0:44 GMT-05:00 stack <saint....@gmail.com>: > > > On Jan 5, 2018 4:44 PM, "Apekshit Sharma" <a...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > > bq. Care needs to be exercised backporting. Bug fixes only please. If in > > doubt, ping me, the RM, please. Thanks. > > In that case, shouldn't we branch out branch-2.0? We can then do normal > > backports to branch-2 and only bug fixes to branch-2.0. > > > > > > > > Don't you think we have enough branches already mighty Appy? > > > > No new features on branch-2? New features are in master/3.0.0 only? > > > > S > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool is a flake, not a consistent fail. > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 7:18 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > This one is probably my fault: > > > > > > > > > > TestDefaultCompactSelection > > > > > > > > > > HBASE-19406 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Balazs fixed it above, HBASE-19666 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It can easily be reverted. The failure of interest > > > > > is TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This seems fine. Passes in nightly > > > > https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase% > > > > 20Nightly/job/branch-2/171/testReport/org.apache.hadoop. > > > > hbase.regionserver/TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool/ > > > > and locally against the tag. It fails consistently for you Andrew? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Should all unit tests pass on a beta? I think so, at least if the > > > > > failures > > > > > > are 100% repeatable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is fair. Let me squash this RC and roll another. > > > > > > > > Will put it up in a few hours. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > S > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -0 > > > > > > > > > > > > Checked sums and signatures: ok > > > > > > RAT check: ok > > > > > > Built from source: ok (8u144) > > > > > > Ran unit tests: some failures (8u144) > > > > > > > > > > > > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio:74-> > > > > > > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy. > > > > > compactEquals:201 > > > > > > expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]> > > > > > > > > > > > > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection. > > testStuckStoreCompaction:145-> > > > > > > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy. > > > > > compactEquals:201 > > > > > > expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but was:<[[99, 30, ]30, 30, 30]> > > > > > > > > > > > > [ERROR] TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool. > > testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleM > > > > > SLABs:143 > > > > > > All the chunks must have been cleared > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> The first release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up at: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0- > > > beta-1-RC0/ > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > > > orgapachehbase-1188 > > > > > >> > > > > > >> All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1] > > > > > >> > > > > > >> I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC0 > > > > > >> (0907563eb72697b394b8b960fe54887d6ff304fd) > > > > > >> > > > > > >> hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It includes all > that > > > was > > > > > in > > > > > >> previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap read/write > path, > > > > > >> in-memory > > > > > >> compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are sealed. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview of > hbase-2.0.0. > > > It > > > > is > > > > > >> meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if we > > > > messed > > > > > up > > > > > >> on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are particular > interested > > > in > > > > > >> hearing from Coprocessor developers. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found here > > > [3]. > > > > > >> There > > > > > >> are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively can > be > > > > found > > > > > >> here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive me if > > mistakes). > > > > > >> > > > > > >> I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 [6]. We'll > do > > > one > > > > > >> more > > > > > >> beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release Candidate by the > end > > > of > > > > > >> January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it so users can > do > > a > > > > > >> rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and any bug > fixes > > > > found > > > > > >> running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have targeted so > far > > > for > > > > > >> beta-2 [5]. Check it out. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> One knownissue is that the User API has not been properly > filtered > > > so > > > > it > > > > > >> shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content > > (HBASE-19663, > > > to > > > > > be > > > > > >> fixed by beta-2). > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it ok > to > > > put > > > > > out > > > > > >> this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been > updated). > > > Let > > > > > the > > > > > >> VOTE be open for 72 hours (Monday) > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Thanks, > > > > > >> Your 2.0.0 Release Manager > > > > > >> > > > > > >> 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search= > 0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2 > > > > > >> 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr > > > > > >> 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b > > > > > >> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/ > > 12340862 > > > > > >> 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/ > > 1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9iEu_ > > > > > >> ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/ > > > > > >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/ > 1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9iEu_ > > > > > ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from > > > truth's > > > > > > decrepit hands > > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from > > truth's > > > > > decrepit hands > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > Andrew > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > > > decrepit hands > > > - A23, Crosstalk > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -- Appy > > >
