https://www.mojohaus.org/flatten-maven-plugin/apidocs/org/codehaus/mojo/flatten/FlattenMode.html
Maybe we should try to use oss or ossrh mode? So we can keep the mailing list and other things in pom. I will try these two options later and post the result here. Thanks. Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> 于2023年3月16日周四 16:29写道： > Heya, > > At the bottom of [0], we're having a small discussion about the impact of > the flatten-maven-plugin on the poms we publish. For background, since > we've started using Maven's "CI Friendly Versions" feature, we have also > started using the flatten plugin on install/deploy [1]. I notice that using > the default configurations, we lose almost all of the project/community > metadata from the poms. I'm wondering if we should go out of our way to > preserve this extra info in our poms, or if it's really just extra weight > in the distribution that users can find on our website. > > Whichever path we choose, we should apply the setting across all of our > project repositories. > > Thanks, > Nick > > [0]: https://github.com/apache/hbase-operator-tools/pull/112 > [1]: https://maven.apache.org/maven-ci-friendly.html#install-deploy >
