On 19/01/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 19/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 19:40 +0000, sebb wrote: > > > On 18/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Folks > > > > > > > > Please take one last look at the preview packages and the release notes: > > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~olegk/httpcore-4.0-beta1-preview/RELEASE_NOTES.txt > > > > http://people.apache.org/~olegk/httpcore-4.0-beta1-preview/packages/ > > > > > > > > If I hear no complaints, I'll go ahead with cutting the final release > > > > packages and call for a vote around 13:00 GMT tomorrow. > > > > > > Sorry, only just noticed that BUILDING.txt mentions: > > > > > > ... (such as NIOSSL) ... > > > and > > > module-niossl/target/httpcore-niossl-<VERSION>.jar > > > > > > Surely NIOSSL is no longer part of the build? > > > > > > Also Java 1.5 is now required for NIO. > > > > > > > Done. > > > > > This is not a blocker, but if you do decide to the text it would be > > > worth stating that Core requires 1.4 and Nio requires 1.5 > > > > > > == > > > > > > Also the directories etc. include alpha7-SNAPSHOT rather than beta1, > > > but I assume that will change when the final packages are built. > > > > > > > Absolutely. > > > > > == > > > > > > The source archive does not seem to contain everything in SVN. The > > > following directory trees are missing: > > > > > > contrib > > > src > > > module-main/src/site > > > module-nio/src/site > > > > > > I can understand why the contrib directory might be omitted, but the > > > src/main/assembly files are needed for the creating a distribution > > > using "mvn package assembly:assembly" as described in BUILDING.txt. > > > > > > And it would do no harm to include the site files. > > > > > > In JMeter we include everything (apart from perhaps the DOAP file) in > > > either the bin or src archives. > > > > > > > Done. > > > > > == > > > > > > BTW, there are some missing SVN properties (e.g. eol-style native) on > > > some of the files in the root directory: > > > > > > doap, LICENSE, pom > > > > > > These probably need to be fixed from a Unix account. > > > > > > Assuming they are LF currently, this won't affect the release > > > preparation if that is also done on Unix. > > > > > > > As far as I understand you took care of that. > > > > Yes, sorry, should have reported that I'd done it. > > I also just fixed the svn props for LICENSE and *.apt. > > > Are there any other problems / release blockers? > > Still getting the NIO test failure - but not every time. >
Just tried a test after having switched off one of the CPUs. The first test after reboot failed, the second worked, and the third and 4th failed. > I don't think it's a release blocker for a Beta release. > However it occurs to me that it should be mentioned in the release > notes (and announce ?). > This is both to warn users and to solicit feedback on which platforms > have the problem and which don't. > > The nio error makes it difficult to test the assembly stage, as > assembly seems to depend on test (perhaps via package). > > BTW: > Is there a way to just perform the assembly? > Likewise can one just perform the nio tests? > > > Oleg > > > > > == > > > > > > S/// > > > > > > > > > > Oleg > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
