On Sun, 2018-11-25 at 10:17 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 3:19 AM Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Sat, 2018-11-24 at 21:43 -0800, Ryan Schmitt wrote: > > > Where's the grief, exactly? The fact that these objects are > > > showing > > > up > > > in heap dumps does not imply performance impact, and no > > > performance > > > impact was claimed, nor were any measurements provided. To state > > > that > > > iterators "have to be garbage collected" is misleading; the Java > > > garbage collector traces live objects, never looking at garbage, > > > which > > > means that ephemeral garbage is virtually free. > > > > Please quantify being 'virtually free' and provide measurements to > > support the claim. > > > > Oh boy, it feels like all sides are claiming some performance > characteristics and in each case the other side is asking for > evidence... > :-( >
I do not need to provide anything. If there is no intermediate garbage, there is no GC overhead. It is that simple. Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
