On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 11:12 -0800, Ryan Schmitt wrote: > I'm not sure what point you're making with these numbers. They're > effectively identical; the GC numbers in particular show no > appreciable allocation or collection in either benchmark. >
I am also unsure what exactly you are trying to prove here but 5041408 and 4310920 do not look effectively identical to me. Oleg > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:05 AM Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > I clearly cannot agree with your conclusion based on the numbers I > > am > > seeing locally. > > > > --- > > Benchmark Mode Cnt Score > > Error Units > > Testing6.index sample 5041408 51.985 > > ± 0.244 ns/op > > Testing6.index:index·p0.00 sample 31.000 > > ns/op > > Testing6.index:index·p0.50 sample 49.000 > > ns/op > > Testing6.index:index·p0.90 sample 52.000 > > ns/op > > Testing6.index:index·p0.95 sample 62.000 > > ns/op > > Testing6.index:index·p0.99 sample 70.000 > > ns/op > > Testing6.index:index·p0.999 sample 149.000 > > ns/op > > Testing6.index:index·p0.9999 sample 3174.873 > > ns/op > > Testing6.index:index·p1.00 sample 46144.000 > > ns/op > > Testing6.index:·gc.alloc.rate sample 5 0.007 > > ± 0.003 MB/sec > > Testing6.index:·gc.alloc.rate.norm sample 5 ≈ > > 10⁻⁴ B/op > > Testing6.index:·gc.count sample 5 ≈ > > 0 counts > > Testing6.iterator sample 4310920 50.587 > > ± 0.233 ns/op > > Testing6.iterator:iterator·p0.00 sample 32.000 > > ns/op > > Testing6.iterator:iterator·p0.50 sample 48.000 > > ns/op > > Testing6.iterator:iterator·p0.90 sample 54.000 > > ns/op > > Testing6.iterator:iterator·p0.95 sample 56.000 > > ns/op > > Testing6.iterator:iterator·p0.99 sample 62.000 > > ns/op > > Testing6.iterator:iterator·p0.999 sample 115.000 > > ns/op > > Testing6.iterator:iterator·p0.9999 sample 1974.000 > > ns/op > > Testing6.iterator:iterator·p1.00 sample 80896.000 > > ns/op > > Testing6.iterator:·gc.alloc.rate sample 5 0.007 > > ± 0.002 MB/sec > > Testing6.iterator:·gc.alloc.rate.norm sample 5 ≈ > > 10⁻⁴ B/op > > Testing6.iterator:·gc.count sample 5 ≈ > > 0 counts > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
