On Sat, 2023-05-20 at 22:58 +0200, Arturo Bernal wrote: > Oleg, > > That's a fair point. For the sake of clarity, does this mean that all > new features or developments over the cache module should conform > with RFC 9111 moving forward? > Let's ensure that we're all on the same page to maintain consistency > across the project. >
Yes, this is the case. There is no point being partially conformant to RFC 2616, RFC 7234 and RFC 9111. We should either conform to RFC 7234 or to RFC 9111 only. Given that I need go through the entire caching protocol specification anyway I thought I might as well use the latest revision. Please use RFC 9111 going forward, and if you have spare cycles help me make sure that our current implementation is also conformant. Cheers Oleg > Arturo Bernal > arturobern...@yahoo.com > > > > > On 20 May 2023, at 19:42, Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > Arturo et al > > > > > > HttpClient Cache module of the HttpComponent Client project has > > never > > been truly reviewed for conformance with RFC73xx. There are still > > many > > instances of references to RFC 2616 in comments and test cases and > > there are several recommendations that the caching module tries to > > fulfill no longer valid or present in the newer revisions of the > > HTTP > > protocol. > > > > However, even though HttpComponents core and client modules are > > still > > at the RFC73xx level, I see no point upgrading the caching module > > to > > conform to RFC 7234 when there is RFC 9111 that supersedes it. > > > > If you have some spare cycles please do feel free to help me with > > the > > review. > > > > Oleg > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org
