Hi Oleg
I completely agree with you on the point that there's no benefit in being partially conformant to multiple RFCs. It is more reasonable and effective for us to conform to either RFC 7234 or RFC 9111. Therefore, I'll be reviewing the caching protocol specification to ensure it is in accordance with RFC 9111. If any discrepancies or issues are found during this review, I will promptly create a ticket and address them accordingly. Arturo Bernal > On 21 May 2023, at 12:44 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > > Yes, this is the case. There is no point being partially conformant to > RFC 2616, RFC 7234 and RFC 9111. We should either conform to RFC 7234 > or to RFC 9111 only. Given that I need go through the entire caching > protocol specification anyway I thought I might as well use the latest > revision. > > Please use RFC 9111 going forward, and if you have spare cycles help me > make sure that our current implementation is also conformant. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org
