We do have a page on "how to release", we haven't put the template for the
email.

Kanak, let me create a 0.7.0 tag.

We dont have to move every ticket to 0.7.0, we can move them as we start
working on a ticket.

Patrick, new vote means just sending an email right. There is nothing wrong
with the release binaries.

thanks,
Kishore G


On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'd prefer that you use the std template for the vote - it captures a
> number of details missing here (see the 0.6.1 vote email)
>
> Don't you guys have a "how to release" page that captures all this?
> (the process, including templates, etc...) It's a huge boon for future
> RMs.
>
> Could you call a new vote?
>
> Patrick
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Kanak Biscuitwala <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We're planning to conduct two near-simultaneous releases, 0.6.2 and
> 0.7.0. This email is for voting on the 0.6.2 release, which mostly consists
> of security and stability fixes, as well as minor feature improvements.
> Here is a list of issues that 0.6.2 addresses:
> >
> > 1. rebalance/ideal state fixes:
> HELIX-150/141/147/148/151/153/154/166/173/205/216/273/277/280
> > 2. zk-session expiry handling fix: HELIX-169/170/171/195/124/28/123/279
> > 3. security fixes: HELIX-257/258
> > 4. zkclient&close() fix: HELIX-264
> > 5. state model leak fix: HELIX-197
> > 6. state model validation: HELIX-144
> > 7. integration test support: HELIX-285
> > 8. YAML cluster setup: HELIX-215
> > 9. project quality improvements: HELIX-70/198/207/218
> >
> > The release is currently staged at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/helix/ and is signed by
> my key (see the KEYS file).
> >
> > Vote:
> >
> > * +1 to approve the 0.6.2-incubating release
> > * 0 to indicate indifference towards the 0.6.2-incubating release
> > * -1 to reject the 0.6.2-incubating release
> >
> > This poll will remain open for at least 72 hours from now. A final score
> of 3 or greater is required to proceed with the release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kanak
>

Reply via email to