+1
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan <hashut...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > With so much active development in different areas of project, proposal > makes sense. > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Alan Gates <alanfga...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Alan. >> >> Vikram Dixit K <vikram.di...@gmail.com> >> February 9, 2015 at 14:43 >> Hi Folks, >> >> We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest of >> time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch committers >> much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an addition >> to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project bylaws >> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html ) >> >> "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative >> branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the branch to >> its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch >> committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an active >> release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project." >> >> Actions: New Branch Committer >> Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the project. >> Approval: Lazy Consensus >> Binding Votes: Active PMC members >> Minimum Length: 3 days >> Mailing List: priv...@hive.apache.org >> >> Actions: Removal of Branch Committer >> Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project. >> Approval: Consensus >> Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in question if >> they are PMC members too. >> Minimum Length: 6 days >> Mailing List: priv...@hive.apache.org >> >> This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote. >> >> Thanks >> Vikram. >> >> >
