Makes sense, +1 On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Brock Noland <br...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> +1 > > > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan <hashut...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > +1 > > With so much active development in different areas of project, proposal > > makes sense. > > > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Alan Gates <alanfga...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> Alan. > >> > >> Vikram Dixit K <vikram.di...@gmail.com> > >> February 9, 2015 at 14:43 > >> Hi Folks, > >> > >> We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest of > >> time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch committers > >> much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an > addition > >> to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project > bylaws > >> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html ) > >> > >> "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative > >> branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the branch > to > >> its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch > >> committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an active > >> release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project." > >> > >> Actions: New Branch Committer > >> Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the project. > >> Approval: Lazy Consensus > >> Binding Votes: Active PMC members > >> Minimum Length: 3 days > >> Mailing List: priv...@hive.apache.org > >> > >> Actions: Removal of Branch Committer > >> Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project. > >> Approval: Consensus > >> Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in question if > >> they are PMC members too. > >> Minimum Length: 6 days > >> Mailing List: priv...@hive.apache.org > >> > >> This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Vikram. > >> > >> > > >
