Thank you everybody, really nice to see this progressing On 3 June 2017 at 03:44, Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> wrote:
> No worries, Mike. Thanks for driving this! > > cheers, > Colin > > > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017, at 12:59, Mike Drob wrote: > > Vote passes with +3 > > * Masatake Iwasaki > > * Elliott Clark > > * Colin McCabe > > > > Will submit to IPMC shortly. > > > > Apologies for letting this slip for so long; other schedules got in the > > way > > of being able to work on this. > > > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > > > I wouldn't worry about it. Ship the thing. > > > > > > I had trouble making it pass all tests on mac. Will did in in time for > next > > > release. > > > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > I always thought that the deadline represented a minimum period, > rather > > > > than a maximum. In other words, the deadline was around to prevent > > > > people from putting out a release in 6 hours or whatever that had > some > > > > undiscovered flaws because people didn't have a chance to examine it. > > > > > > > > I don't remember us ever re-doing a vote because the period had been > > > > exceeded without enough votes coming in. But looking at > > > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html , it doesn't seem to > > > > settle the issue one way or another. Does anyone know if there is a > > > > formal rule for this? > > > > > > > > I guess to be on the safe side, you could start a new vote and have > > > > people re-cast. > > > > > > > > cheers, > > > > Colin > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 23, 2017, at 18:22, Mike Drob wrote: > > > > > A question about protocol here... Two of the votes have come in > past > > > the > > > > > deadline, but without them we wouldn't have had enough votes to get > > > > > quorum > > > > > on the release. Can we still accept them and move forward, or do we > > > need > > > > > to > > > > > start over with a new vote? I'd really like to avoid the second > option > > > > > since getting enough votes here has been tenuous. > > > > > > > > > > I'm also making a note for myself for future votes that seven days > is > > > > > probably a better window than five. > > > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Verified checksums > > > > > > Build from source using Maven 3.0.4 (with -Pnative) > > > > > > Successfully ran unit tests > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 22, 2017, at 01:18, Elliott Clark wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > verified signatures. > > > > > > > build from source. > > > > > > > Checked that everything looked to be in the correct locations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Masatake Iwasaki < > > > > > > > iwasak...@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * verified signature and mds. > > > > > > > > * built and installed from source tarball by maven-3.0.4. > > > > > > > > * built hadoop trunk against htrace-4.3.0-incubating. > > > > > > > > * verified that spans in HDFS works by HTracedSpanReceiver > and > > > > htraced. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Masatake Iwasaki > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/17/17 05:40, Mike Drob wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Devs, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Please consider the following release candidate for Apache > > > HTrace > > > > > > > >> 4.3.0-incubating! > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/htrace-4.3.0-incubating- > rc3/ > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> The jars have been staged here: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > > > > > orgapachehtrace-1029 > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> There's a few minor fixes in this release: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> ** Bug > > > > > > > >> * [HTRACE-387] - htrace-c should have a test > dependency on > > > > htrace > > > > > > > >> -htraced > > > > > > > >> * [HTRACE-393] - Binary annotations are being shown as > > > > base64 in > > > > > > the > > > > > > > >> zipkin frontend > > > > > > > >> * [HTRACE-398] - Enforce requirement to build with > Maven > > > > 3.0.4 > > > > > > from > > > > > > > >> HTRACE-236 > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> ** Improvement > > > > > > > >> * [HTRACE-386] - htrace-c: add functions for > retrieving the > > > > span > > > > > > ID > > > > > > > >> to > > > > > > > >> the public API > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> RC History: > > > > > > > >> RC0 - Discarded due to user error. > > > > > > > >> RC1 - Missing some version string updates, vote failed. > > > > > > > >> RC2 - Discarded due to missing HTRACE-398 > > > > > > > >> RC3 - Current > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> This vote will run for 5 days ( Sun May 21 21:30:00 UTC > 2017 ) > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Thanks, > > > > > > > >> Mike > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >