Cliff Woolley wrote:
>
> I'm sure this has been discussed, but someone please remind me what was
> decided. Are we going to continue to maintain mod_tls? I'm sure there
> are some changes that have been made to mod_ssl that would need to be
> ported over to mod_tls if we are.
<disclaimer: definately not an expert on this stuff>
I believe mod_tls is a layer that isolates mod_ssl from the filter chain
in 2.0. So we need both. If someone wrote an alterative to mod_ssl,
presumably that would use mod_tls as well.
Greg
