From: "Cliff Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:16 PM > Besides, I just think it looks bad for us to constantly be swaying back > and forth. Oh, this release is a beta for Unix but not Win32. Oh, this > one is good on Win32 but only alpha-and-a-half for Unix. Notice that os/foo is nearly depleted :)
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Ryan Bloom
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Ian Holsman
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Bill Stoddard
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Ian Holsman
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Bill Stoddard
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Cliff Woolley
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Greg Ames
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Bill Stoddard
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Cliff Woolley
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Bill Stoddard
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Cliff Woolley
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Joshua Slive
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Greg Stein
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Bill Stoddard
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Jeff Trawick