> On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Bill Stoddard wrote: > > > > I'm -1 on calling any Win32 release a beta without those eliminated > > > > I'm okay with only declaring beta on Unix/Linux. > > I don't think I am. Let's get this taken care of. :-/ > Why? Most serious Apache users run Unix/Linux. And thread support under Unix/Linux is one of the main features of Apache 2.0. Obviously we need to fix Win32 but it is wrong to delay the beta because of Win32. IMHO. Bill
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Ryan Bloom
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Bill Stoddard
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Ryan Bloom
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Ian Holsman
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Bill Stoddard
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Ian Holsman
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Bill Stoddard
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Cliff Woolley
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Greg Ames
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Bill Stoddard
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Cliff Woolley
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Bill Stoddard
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Cliff Woolley
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Joshua Slive
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Greg Stein
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Bill Stoddard
- Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Jeff Trawick