This will break things. We will no longer be keeping track of the listener, which
is a bad thing. I will fix this later this weekend, but the worker MPM is broken
now.
Ryan
On Saturday 25 August 2001 18:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dougm 01/08/25 18:17:32
>
> Modified: server/mpm/worker worker.c
> Log:
> i think the answer to aaron's question is "a typo". otherwise there is
> actually 1 less thread available to serve requests than configured.
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.16 +2 -3 httpd-2.0/server/mpm/worker/worker.c
>
> Index: worker.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/server/mpm/worker/worker.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.15
> retrieving revision 1.16
> diff -u -r1.15 -r1.16
> --- worker.c 2001/08/24 16:49:39 1.15
> +++ worker.c 2001/08/26 01:17:32 1.16
> @@ -755,9 +755,8 @@
> my_info->sd = 0;
> apr_thread_create(&listener, thread_attr, listener_thread, my_info,
> pchild); while (1) {
> - /* Does ap_threads_per_child include the listener thread?
> - * Why does this forloop start at 1? -aaron */
> - for (i = 1; i < ap_threads_per_child; i++) {
> + /* Does ap_threads_per_child include the listener thread? */
> + for (i = 0; i < ap_threads_per_child; i++) {
> int status =
> ap_scoreboard_image->servers[child_num_arg][i].status;
>
> if (status != SERVER_GRACEFUL && status != SERVER_DEAD) {
--
______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------
