Guys,
Whatever you want to do. I don't care. Vote on mod_gz for 2.x and
mod_gzip for 1.3.x (we submitted this to the ASF last October 13 2000)
It's really that simple, you can debate it for evermore. Kevin and I are
focused on mod_gzip 2.x which will be released when 2.x goes solid beta.
This is my last 2 cents worth. Time's a wasting.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Sander Striker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0
> Marc,
>
> Rather than continue this thread let's see if we can put this subject
> into the end zone.
>
> >> Think then act, not the other way around.
>
> Then vote on it. Either +1 or -1 on including mod_gzip into the Apache
> distribution.
>
> Simple.
It isn't as simple as that. You can't just call out a vote to push this
through. Lets let this issue settle down first and focus on 2.0 getting
good enough for beta. In the mean time mod_gz and mod_gzip (if code is
posted) can be reviewed. If there is a maintainer within the ASF, there
can be a vote if needed. Otherwise, we don't need a vote, since if the
ASF isn't going to maintain it, it isn't going in *. This is what Marc
was trying to say aswell I think. I don't think the majority of the
httpd developers are going to +1 putting mod_gzip in. Remember that
they are the ones having to maintain it and ensure its quality, not you
(unless ofcourse you join the development team).
Right now it seems like some people are getting worked up and that is
not a good environment to make decisions in. Personally I don't even
think it is time for this decision.
Sander
*) At least that is how I understand it and would find it logical to
be.
> Peter.
>
> PS. (If I remember rightly I think you already voted +1 on the license
> for mod_gzip so this should be an easy decision)
Things are getting twisted...
