On Friday 07 September 2001 17:46, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:27:05PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Ben Hyde wrote:
> > > To repeat all these inform the debate, they are a list
> > > of things to think about, but we don't have and don't
> > > want some objective scoring scheme for these; the
> > > public debate process while tedious is good - particularly
> > > when we all remain gentlemenly.
> >
> > Here here. My intent was not scoring, but rather, as you said,
> > an honest *discussion* of the module, and some topics that
> > should be discussed about it. I just don't want us to not do
> > What's Right in this case simply because of the emotions
> > that the debate caused.
>
> There shouldn't be any emotions at this point. There is no contention
> between two modules. We are only talking about mod_gz, which Ian posted a
> while back.
>
> Current consensus appears to be to add it to modules/experimental.
I don't see how that could possibly be the consensus, since I have -1 in
the STATUS file.
Ryan
______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------
