On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:27:05PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Ben Hyde wrote: > > > > To repeat all these inform the debate, they are a list > > of things to think about, but we don't have and don't > > want some objective scoring scheme for these; the > > public debate process while tedious is good - particularly > > when we all remain gentlemenly. > > Here here. My intent was not scoring, but rather, as you said, > an honest *discussion* of the module, and some topics that > should be discussed about it. I just don't want us to not do > What's Right in this case simply because of the emotions > that the debate caused. There shouldn't be any emotions at this point. There is no contention between two modules. We are only talking about mod_gz, which Ian posted a while back. Current consensus appears to be to add it to modules/experimental. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap TOKILEY
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap TOKILEY
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Greg Stein
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Jim Jagielski
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Doug MacEachern
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Greg Stein
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Jim Jagielski
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Greg Stein
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Jim Jagielski
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Ryan Bloom
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Greg Stein
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Ryan Bloom
- RE: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Peter J. Cranstone
- RE: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Peter J. Cranstone
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap TOKILEY