>> All I keep thinking, is that we are trying to spite RC by adding a
different GZ module
Don't worry about it. Let's see if we can make a decision on what is
good for the survival of Apache irrespective of what that means for RC.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 7:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Greg Stein
Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
On Monday 10 September 2001 03:59, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 10:38:45PM -0700, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >...
> > Ryan's veto has effectively tabled this for now. I'm begining to
> >respect this from the perspective of putting a release in peoples
> >hands. It can be introduced soon afterwards, or if someone likes, a
> >subproject can be created. This has been too long people, let's put
> >2.0 to bed.
>
> Some people believe his veto is illegitimate -- that there is no
> technical reason for vetoing the inclusion into modules/experimental.
I have removed my veto. Although, I would point out that illegitimate
veto or not, nobody in this group has ever gotten away with going
through a veto. The only reason I have removed my veto is that it really
looks like everybody was about to ignore it anyway. This whole thing
just leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth. All I keep thinking, is
that we are trying to spite RC by adding a different GZ module.
Ryan ______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------
