Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS

[Pier Fumagalli]

"Gomez Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> As a mod_gzip user, I was first happy to see it included in Apache 2.0
> distro, but Ryan got very valid arguments, one being that the core should
> be tiny, fast and bug free.
> 
> The argument for having modules included in release is that if
> they are outside, they are invisible, but on the contrary having the
> modules outside core, will help modules writers be more reactive.
> 
> A clean solution could be to add a page (on site and in distro)
> listing all known external modules, functionnalities provided and
> of course their home page.
> 
> Apache 1.3 used to have a contrib tar.gz, it may be also another
> alternative.
> 
> I'm strongly for small core and +1 with Ryan here.

It's the second time in one day we agree... That's a bad sign :) I too am
with Ryan on this (but not being a committer, I can't cast a vote)

    Pier