* On 2001-09-10 at 11:17, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> excited the electrons to say: > > I dislike the feeling that 'experimental' is a valid dumping ground > for modules that we think are cool can can't be bothered with. Is that supposed to be 'but can't be bothered with'? If so, that is not the case at all -- people *want* to bother with it, but the 2.0-ASAP crowd felt it would detract from *their* agenda. :-D > forget the reason why we *have* to include it (and why we have to > include it *right now*) but anyway.... the whole thing seems > a bit rushed/forced for my tastes. I personally am in no rush.. I just want it in /experimental/ when 2.0 GAs. -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "All right everyone! Step away from the glowing hamburger!"
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Jeff Trawick
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Graham Leggett
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Graham Leggett
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Greg Stein
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Greg Stein
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Greg Stein
- RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Joshua Slive
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Greg Stein
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS TOKILEY
- why mod_gz "now" ? (was: Re: cvs com... Greg Stein
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Joshua Slive
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS TOKILEY
