On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 11:37:20AM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > * On 2001-09-10 at 11:17, > Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> excited the electrons to say: > > > > I dislike the feeling that 'experimental' is a valid dumping ground > > for modules that we think are cool can can't be bothered with. > > Is that supposed to be 'but can't be bothered with'? If so, that > is not the case at all -- people *want* to bother with it, > but the 2.0-ASAP crowd felt it would detract from *their* agenda. :-D Yup. As I explained to Kevin Kiley, having it in experimental *means* that we can bother with it. It is really difficult to do that while it is a patch being "maintained" by a single person. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Graham Leggett
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Graham Leggett
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Greg Stein
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Greg Stein
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Greg Stein
- RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Joshua Slive
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Greg Stein
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS TOKILEY
- why mod_gz "now" ? (was: Re: cvs com... Greg Stein
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Joshua Slive
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS TOKILEY
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Greg Stein