On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 11:37:20AM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> * On 2001-09-10 at 11:17,
>   Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> excited the electrons to say:
> > 
> > I dislike the feeling that 'experimental' is a valid dumping ground
> > for modules that we think are cool can can't be bothered with.
> 
> Is that supposed to be 'but can't be bothered with'?  If so, that
> is not the case at all -- people *want* to bother with it,
> but the 2.0-ASAP crowd felt it would detract from *their* agenda. :-D

Yup. As I explained to Kevin Kiley, having it in experimental *means* that
we can bother with it. It is really difficult to do that while it is a
patch being "maintained" by a single person.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/

Reply via email to