Sorry, makes no difference. Although I hadn't previously used the -n arg, using it didn't change the behavior.
-----Original Message----- From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18) bin\apache -k install -n Apache2 THEN; apache -k start -n apache2 -OR- net start Apache2 The Apache2 (default) may have tripped you up. Keeps it distinct from 1.3 generation apache services, but you can use the -n Apache arg instead, if you like. Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Seidel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:58 AM Subject: RE: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18) > Whoops, that was a typo. I am indeed using the 2.0.28 beta release. Sorry > for the confusion. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 11:40 AM > To: Apache-Dev; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.18 as Win2k service > > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Dave Seidel wrote: > > > I just built a 2.0.18 binary from scratch from the zip archive, using VC6 > on > > Win2K. Works fine from the console, but it does not work as a service. > > Any ideas? Is this a tested configuration in this beta (I don't see much > > about it in the status reports)? What else can I try to provide more > data? > > Please try again with 2.0.28, the most recent beta. 2.0.18, besides being > very old at this point, was released as an alpha release, not beta. > > Thanks! > --Cliff > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Cliff Woolley > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Charlottesville, VA > > > > > > >
