On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 07:58:57PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I'm also thinking of the # of patches OtherBill is folding in > as well... By "bumping" the tag, do you mean having the tag > say something like APACHE_1_3_23_R2 or something? Not APACHE_1_3_24 > right? :) :) > > Bill Stoddard wrote: > > > > The tarball hasn't been rolled, so if the change is simple, why not make the >change and > > bump the tag? This method has worked pretty good for 2.0 if we impose a >reasonable time > > limit between the tag and the roll (say 24 hours).
+1 on Bill's suggestion. And no, it wouldn't be funny tags. We'd just point the tag at a different revision for that one file. For all intents and purposes, the fix is now part of the 1.3.23 tag. btw, Bill: you can/should still manually tag that .cvsignore to be correct. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
