Jeff Trawick wrote: > > Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Bill Stoddard wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > If httpd is linked sans thread libs, then calling these functions should > > > > always return true, but not actually acomplish anything intended. > > > > > > :-OOO > > > > > > > I'm not sure *what* the surprise emoticon is, but I'm ditto. It appears > > that there are basically null-stubs in libc for various pthread functions. > > Supremely bogus. First fix would be to always add -lpthread but the > > what we should really do is test if we are compiling with the PTHREAD mutex > > and only add then. > > I'm not sure why we'd need to test. Current code says that if it is > Solaris then we define HAVE_PTHREAD_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT. I changed > Configure yesterday to unconditionally add -lpthread (it looks to me > that we get -lthread for free since -lpthread is a wrapper???). >
Yeah.... yer right. If they know to disable HAVE_PTHREAD_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT then they know to remove the -lpthread... or not to if they want. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
