On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 01:39:33PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: > That is a long-standing bug that most of us have argued against now. In > the past, we said that the C-L had to be removed, because a filter could > have modified the length. Now, most of us have said that this is just > plain wrong, and if a filter wants to modify the length, then they > should remove the C-L for us.
Ah, okay. So, this answers my question I just asked - if a C-L entry exists in r->headers_out, ap_content_length_filter should just get out of the way, right? -- justin
