Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > Here's my question: why is C-L filter even getting involved if there > is a C-L header? Why shouldn't it just get out of the way if there > is a C-L already present? Why do the duplication? Should we assume > that any module that changes the content is smart enough to unset it? > Perhaps we can't do that - a module might change the content but not > unset C-L? -- justin
I would argue that a module that changes the content-length, but does
not remove the CL header is broken.
Regards,
Graham
--
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
